Proceedings of CICC 97 - Custom Integrated Circuits Conference
DOI: 10.1109/cicc.1997.606669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

VLSI implementation of a 200-MHz 16×16 left-to-right carry-free multiplier in 0.35 μm CMOS technology for next-generation DSPs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We find that the right-to-left array multiplier without a fast final adder needs 59 unit delays, while the left-to-right array multiplier with on-the-fly converters takes only 42 unit delays. Therefore, the 8 × 8 left-to-right full-width multiplier is about 28% faster than the right-to-left full-width multiplier, and this estimation is close to that reported in [5]. There still exist rooms for speed improvement for the basic left-to-right multiplier.…”
Section: Conventional Left-to-right Full-width Multipliersupporting
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We find that the right-to-left array multiplier without a fast final adder needs 59 unit delays, while the left-to-right array multiplier with on-the-fly converters takes only 42 unit delays. Therefore, the 8 × 8 left-to-right full-width multiplier is about 28% faster than the right-to-left full-width multiplier, and this estimation is close to that reported in [5]. There still exist rooms for speed improvement for the basic left-to-right multiplier.…”
Section: Conventional Left-to-right Full-width Multipliersupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The block diagram of a left-to-right full-width multiplier is shown in Fig. 3 described in [5]. The circuit between the dashed lines is used to interface the added converters to the original array.…”
Section: Conventional Left-to-right Full-width Multipliermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the first group the optimization is done by manipulating the sub-blocks of the multiplier such as full adders and logic gates [3]. In the second category a new structure is proposed for multipliers based on the bus width and other parameters [4]. In this paper an efficient algorithm is used to minimize the delay of the whole multiplier block by minimizing the delay of intermediate stages via transistor sizing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal final adder for tree multipliers is CSMA based design [16]. Efficient design of on-the-fly converter for L-R array multipliers also corresponds to a multi-level carryselect (CSEL) or conditional-sum (CSUM) adders [11]. In [19], generalized earliest-first (GEF) algorithm was proposed to design CSUM for arbitrary input arrival profile.…”
Section: Final Addermentioning
confidence: 99%