Abstract:Sustainable development of a community needs to be balanced in all dimensions. Global warming and climate change from human emissions can affect the development of communities including highland communities in Chiang Rai, Thailand in terms of human life, growth and yield of plants and animals. This research presents low-carbon tourism for the sustainable development of the rural highland community in Chiang Rai, Thailand by integrating economic, social and environmental objectives in community development for … Show more
“…There is no doubt that Tourism Villages have contributed large CO 2 emissions by the tourist attractions which were the main business of the seven Tourism Villages in Indonesia considered in this study, as well as in the heritage sites of Yogyakarta Special Region in Indonesia and also the Wulingyuan Scenic/Historic Interest Area (WSHIA) and Guizhou ethnic locations in China [11][12][13]. For the new concept of low-carbon tourism to be implemented to increase the wealth of the tourism industry's actors [7][8][9][10], several actions in low-carbon approaches are a necessity. Lessons learned about proper waste management from tourism areas of Madeira Island, Portugal [18] and Coachella Valley, California, USA [19] will be valuable to the Tourism Villages, which have large numbers of visitors and populations, as in Dieng Kulon Tourism Village.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates that a change of paradigm is needed, due to individual awareness, attitudes, capacity to change, as well as social alterations such as the cultures and environments in Tourism Villages. Furthermore, a social education of low-carbon habits was necessary for achieving better environmental qualities (cleaner, healthier, and sustainable), indicating that the community should lead health management, create societal strength, and develop a sustainable Tourism Village [7]. The stakeholders (government, tourism village's community, population, tourists or visitors) of Tourism Village development should also be involved in implementing low-carbon sustainability [13].…”
Section: Comprehensive Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since this emission is being produced by tourism activities, several reduction actions should be implemented in maintaining sustainable development towards a low-carbon economy [6]. This economy has been developed towards a new concept of low-carbon tourism based on sustainability [7][8][9][10]. The carbon footprint of tourism is known as the direct emission of exploratory activities and embodiments within the tourists' purchased commodities, such as transportation, fuel, food, accommodation (hotels, guest houses, homestays, etc.…”
The tourism industry is the most significant global Green House Gases (GHGs) contributor, which is often specifically produced by exploratory activities. This leads to the performance of several actions to reduce carbon emissions and maintain sustainable development. Since the Indonesian Tourism Village is a “carbon emission contributor and COVID-19 pandemic impact victim”, the low-carbon exploration should be necessarily implemented to achieve sustainability. Therefore, this study aims to determine the carbon footprint of solid waste produced by visitors, population, and buildings within seven certified Tourism Villages in Central Java (Kandri, Lerep, Samiran, Karangrejo, Candirejo, Samiran, and Dieng Kulon) and Special Region of Yogyakarta (Pentingsari) Provinces, Indonesia. This was conducted through a mixed method containing quantitative and analytical techniques. The quantitative method was conducted through a field survey of seven Tourism Villages to obtain and analyze data on the population, infrastructures, situations, and environments. Meanwhile, the analytical method was conducted by calculating the carbon footprint of solid waste and buildings produced by seven Tourism Villages. The results showed that Dieng Kulon had the biggest CO2 emissions from all sources (solid waste produced by visitors, population, and buildings). In addition, Candirejo had the lowest solid waste emission produced by visitors and the population before the impact of the pandemic. During the COVID-19 period, Kandri and Samiran were observed as the lowest contributors of solid-waste CO2 emission produced by visitors and buildings, respectively. This indicated that the sustainability of Tourism Villages helped in increasing income as well as obtaining a cleaner and healthier environment. After the pandemic period, these villages should subsequently lead the economic recovery of rural communities to achieve sustainable development goals through the reduction of CO2 emission. In addition, the “The Low-Carbon Sustainable Tourism Village Model” was proposed by this study to answer the challenge of sustainability.
“…There is no doubt that Tourism Villages have contributed large CO 2 emissions by the tourist attractions which were the main business of the seven Tourism Villages in Indonesia considered in this study, as well as in the heritage sites of Yogyakarta Special Region in Indonesia and also the Wulingyuan Scenic/Historic Interest Area (WSHIA) and Guizhou ethnic locations in China [11][12][13]. For the new concept of low-carbon tourism to be implemented to increase the wealth of the tourism industry's actors [7][8][9][10], several actions in low-carbon approaches are a necessity. Lessons learned about proper waste management from tourism areas of Madeira Island, Portugal [18] and Coachella Valley, California, USA [19] will be valuable to the Tourism Villages, which have large numbers of visitors and populations, as in Dieng Kulon Tourism Village.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates that a change of paradigm is needed, due to individual awareness, attitudes, capacity to change, as well as social alterations such as the cultures and environments in Tourism Villages. Furthermore, a social education of low-carbon habits was necessary for achieving better environmental qualities (cleaner, healthier, and sustainable), indicating that the community should lead health management, create societal strength, and develop a sustainable Tourism Village [7]. The stakeholders (government, tourism village's community, population, tourists or visitors) of Tourism Village development should also be involved in implementing low-carbon sustainability [13].…”
Section: Comprehensive Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since this emission is being produced by tourism activities, several reduction actions should be implemented in maintaining sustainable development towards a low-carbon economy [6]. This economy has been developed towards a new concept of low-carbon tourism based on sustainability [7][8][9][10]. The carbon footprint of tourism is known as the direct emission of exploratory activities and embodiments within the tourists' purchased commodities, such as transportation, fuel, food, accommodation (hotels, guest houses, homestays, etc.…”
The tourism industry is the most significant global Green House Gases (GHGs) contributor, which is often specifically produced by exploratory activities. This leads to the performance of several actions to reduce carbon emissions and maintain sustainable development. Since the Indonesian Tourism Village is a “carbon emission contributor and COVID-19 pandemic impact victim”, the low-carbon exploration should be necessarily implemented to achieve sustainability. Therefore, this study aims to determine the carbon footprint of solid waste produced by visitors, population, and buildings within seven certified Tourism Villages in Central Java (Kandri, Lerep, Samiran, Karangrejo, Candirejo, Samiran, and Dieng Kulon) and Special Region of Yogyakarta (Pentingsari) Provinces, Indonesia. This was conducted through a mixed method containing quantitative and analytical techniques. The quantitative method was conducted through a field survey of seven Tourism Villages to obtain and analyze data on the population, infrastructures, situations, and environments. Meanwhile, the analytical method was conducted by calculating the carbon footprint of solid waste and buildings produced by seven Tourism Villages. The results showed that Dieng Kulon had the biggest CO2 emissions from all sources (solid waste produced by visitors, population, and buildings). In addition, Candirejo had the lowest solid waste emission produced by visitors and the population before the impact of the pandemic. During the COVID-19 period, Kandri and Samiran were observed as the lowest contributors of solid-waste CO2 emission produced by visitors and buildings, respectively. This indicated that the sustainability of Tourism Villages helped in increasing income as well as obtaining a cleaner and healthier environment. After the pandemic period, these villages should subsequently lead the economic recovery of rural communities to achieve sustainable development goals through the reduction of CO2 emission. In addition, the “The Low-Carbon Sustainable Tourism Village Model” was proposed by this study to answer the challenge of sustainability.
“…LCT is an emerging concept proposed in 2009 (Bhaktikul, 2021). It aims to deal with the challenges of carbon-intensive tourism activities (Hsiao, 2016).…”
Purpose
Underpinned by three-factor theory, this study aims to: examine the dynamics (asymmetry) of multi-quality low-carbon attributes towards the Thai tourists’ perception and prioritise carbon-tourism attributes on the basis of impact-range performance and asymmetric analysis.
Design/methodology/approach
The study applies a multi-method approach to derive the low-carbon tourism (LCT) items before conducting exploratory factor analysis to identify the underlying dimensions. Impact range performance analysis and impact asymmetry analysis were carried out to explore the asymmetric or symmetric relationship associated with tourists’ perception of LCT.
Findings
Findings reveal the three dimensions of the LCT attributes. Out of the 29 attributes, nine are regarded as “must-have” categories, such that tourists will be disappointed at the efforts of a low-carbon destination if these attributes are missing, but they will feel neutral if the attributes are present. Six LCT attributes fall into the “hybrid” category, such that tourists will appreciate if they perceive these attributes to be available for LCT and feel disappointed if these attributes are not or poorly offered. Fourteen attributes are considered under the “value-added” category, meaning tourists will only appreciate if they encounter these attributes at the destination, and the lack thereof will not cause any dissatisfaction or negative perception from tourists.
Originality/value
Through the multi-quality asymmetric analysis, the study provides deep insights into the degree of perception of the 29 LCT attributes. The study offers tangible guidelines to destination authorities and pinpoints the necessity to provide attributes, especially in the “hybrid” and “must-have” categories, to avoid tourists’ negative perceptions when they visit a low-carbon destination.
“…Thai economic development is heavily based on the tourism industry as the revenue generated from tourism industry has vital importance for Thailand's economy. This industry promoting the economic development of Thailand through different ways (Bhaktikul, Aroonsrimorakot, Laiphrakpam, & Paisantanakij, 2021;Yodsuwan et al, 2019). The revenue generated from this industry contributing to the wellbeing of the people and this industry providing several employment opportunities for the people.…”
Developing loyalty among tourists who visit secondary cities of provinces in Southern Thailand represents a way to support entrepreneurs in the areas of tourist attractions and businesses that are part of the networks of tourist service provision. However, the promotion of tourist loyalty is crucial problem in Southern Thailand. Despite the significant growth of tourism industry in Thailand, still the tourist loyalty is needed to promote to achieve higher performance in tourism industry. To address this challenge, this study examined the role of tourist attraction potential, government policies, service innovation and travel intention on tourist loyalty. To achieve this purpose, this study considered mixed method approach and data collection is performed through questionnaire survey and interviews in Southern part of Thailand. Statistical tool is used to examine the relationship between variables. Results of the study investigated that; tourist attraction potential, government policies, service innovation and travel intention have vital contribution to promote tourist loyalty in Southern part of Thailand. This study recommended that the tourism management companies should promote tourist loyalty by promoting tourist attraction potential, government policies, service innovation and travel intention.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.