2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0732-8893(03)00081-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The sensitivity and specificity of Brucella agglutination tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
56
0
6

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
56
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were obtained by [28,29], who reported 95.7% and 96% agreement respectively between the RBPT and SAT tests. Other investigators reported 100% agreement with [30] RBPT SAT (≥1:160) 2ME …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Similar results were obtained by [28,29], who reported 95.7% and 96% agreement respectively between the RBPT and SAT tests. Other investigators reported 100% agreement with [30] RBPT SAT (≥1:160) 2ME …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The diagnosis of brucellosis is usually based on clinical evaluation and laboratory results. Generally, the diagnosis of brucellosis needs to be confirmed by a serum agglutination test or isolation of the organism from blood or other sterile samples [14,15]. Though blood culture is the gold standard in the diagnosis of bacteremia, more than three days are required for the final results to be available, and the sensitivity is low.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…İndirekt ELISA, brusellozis taramasında tek başına veya RBPT'e ek olarak kullanılabilecek iyi bir test olabilir [18][19][20][21] . Serolojik testlerin karşılaştırıldığı diğer çalış-malarda ELISA'nın duyarlılık ve özgüllüğü STAT 'a eşit veya daha yüksek bulunmuştur 5,8,19,21,22 .…”
Section: Tartıșmaunclassified