2008
DOI: 10.1590/s1807-76922008000400006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The learning process in interorganizational relationships

Abstract: This study was inspired by the proposition developed by Karthik (2002) and applied to a context of horizontal interorganizational relations. Our main objective was to understand how the learning process between organizations inserted in networks occurs, from the perspective of the evolution of relationships over time. This study has a qualitative and exploratory nature, and the method adopted is the case study with multiple units of analysis. The research was carried out in a network of thirteen supermarket co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Brazilian context, several studies highlighted the motivations for cooperation (Verschoore & Balestrin, 2008a), network outcomes (Castro, Bulgacov, & Hoffmann, 2011;Marchi, Cassanego, & Wittmann, 2012;Verschoore & Balestrin, 2008b), learning processes (Balestrin et al, 2008;Estivalete, Pedrozo, & Cruz, 2008), difficulties faced by IONs (Esteves & Nohara, 2011;Wegner & Padula, 2012) and cooperation management (Bortolaso, Verschoore, & Antunes, 2012;Kwasnicka, 2006). However, only a small number of studies examined network developmental trajectories (Bortolaso et al, 2012;Camargo, Verschoore, & Padilha, 2013).…”
Section: A Common View Of the Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the Brazilian context, several studies highlighted the motivations for cooperation (Verschoore & Balestrin, 2008a), network outcomes (Castro, Bulgacov, & Hoffmann, 2011;Marchi, Cassanego, & Wittmann, 2012;Verschoore & Balestrin, 2008b), learning processes (Balestrin et al, 2008;Estivalete, Pedrozo, & Cruz, 2008), difficulties faced by IONs (Esteves & Nohara, 2011;Wegner & Padula, 2012) and cooperation management (Bortolaso, Verschoore, & Antunes, 2012;Kwasnicka, 2006). However, only a small number of studies examined network developmental trajectories (Bortolaso et al, 2012;Camargo, Verschoore, & Padilha, 2013).…”
Section: A Common View Of the Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If such SFNs can once again motivate members and develop new collective actions, they may reach a consolidated level; otherwise, they may face decline. Estivalete, Pedrozo and Cruz (2008) stressed that in the development step the business networks have a shared learning process through exchange of information between the actors and this is due, in large part, to the engagement and degree of trust between network members.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Established Sfnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, facing this emerging reality (Estivalete, Pedrozo, & Cruz, 2008), this research field still requires theoretical studies, particularly of an empirical nature, such as those by MacDonald and Crossan (2010), that deal with the learning between different organizations. Knight and Pye (2005) identify the central role of social interactions in their study of IOL in interorganizational relationships.…”
Section: Multi-level Structure Of the Learning Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antonello and Godoy (2009, 2010 identified gaps in studies on organizational learning and highlighted the need to expand their scope of analysis by identifying learning processes that pervade organizational boundaries, which reinforces the need to introduce additional units of analysis in order to advance this field of knowledge. Considering this, Hardy, Phillips and Lawrence (2003), Greve (2005), Engeström and Kerosuo (2007), Inkpen and Tsang (2007), Nooteboon (2008), Estivalete, Pedrozo and Cruz (2008) and Balestrin and Verschoore (2008) amongst others point out the need to deepen studies on IOL.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enquanto empresas líderes tendem a se concentrar em inovações visando a redução de custos, as seguidoras baseiam-se mais em imitações, e sua entrada no mercado dificilmente pode ser evitada. O imitador não necessita amortizar os pesados investimentos em P&D e pode se beneficiar da experiência de outras empresas do mercado em que atua ou de outros mercados (ENKEL e GASSMANN, 2010;ESTIVALETE, PEDROZO, CRUZ, 2008;KIM e MINER, 2007). A imitação também pode levar as organizações à inovação.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified