2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.08.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of housing tenure and marital status on smoking in South Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(61 reference statements)
6
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with other studies [34][35][36][37][38] and can be explained by that the better educated one is, the more concerned one would be about health and therefore the lesser the likelihood to smoke.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This is consistent with other studies [34][35][36][37][38] and can be explained by that the better educated one is, the more concerned one would be about health and therefore the lesser the likelihood to smoke.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Most of the unskilled workers significantly never tried to quit may be due to high stress or being dissatisfied with their work. The present study findings were consistent with that of previous studies in Europe and Asia studies 7,30,31 where it had been hypothesized that lower level occupational groups face more physical and psychosocial stress compared with the white-collar and therefore are more engaged in bad habits, such as smoking/chewing tobacco. The previous study also noted that smoking acts as a coping mechanism to manage stress.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Family and social support has been shown to be an effective intervention for improving other health behaviors, such as dietary changes (weight reduction and medication compliance). It remains a proven fact that single or divorced people take more to tobacco consumption as married men receive social and psychological support from their spouses to quit tobacco (Lim et al, 2010;Lim et al, 2013).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%