2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.05.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The application of a hierarchical, decision-support system to evaluate multi-objective forest management strategies: a case study in northeastern British Columbia, Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Potential frameworks for such integration efforts include multi-scale hierarchical approaches assuring consistent and robust scaling (cf. Mäkelä, 2003); modular designs, which allow the incorporation of processes in their respective spatial and temporal domain with interactions facilitated by a common platform (e.g., Scheller et al, 2007); metamodel concepts to consistently scale and integrate process models (e.g., Urban et al, 1999;Seidl et al, 2009); and hybrid approaches integrating multiple concepts towards a balanced representation of a wide variety of ecosystem processes (e.g., Seely et al, 2004).…”
Section: Level Of Organization Concept a Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potential frameworks for such integration efforts include multi-scale hierarchical approaches assuring consistent and robust scaling (cf. Mäkelä, 2003); modular designs, which allow the incorporation of processes in their respective spatial and temporal domain with interactions facilitated by a common platform (e.g., Scheller et al, 2007); metamodel concepts to consistently scale and integrate process models (e.g., Urban et al, 1999;Seidl et al, 2009); and hybrid approaches integrating multiple concepts towards a balanced representation of a wide variety of ecosystem processes (e.g., Seely et al, 2004).…”
Section: Level Of Organization Concept a Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. Three different ecosystem conditions (lines 1-3) sustained by particular frequencies and severities of management-induced ecosystem disturbance applied repeatedly, compared with a sequence of conditions over time produced by changing the management regime periodically (line 4) (Kimmins 2004). The legend at the right of the diagram refers to clearcutting (CL) and partial harvesting (PH) in systems 1-3.…”
Section: Forecasting Tools For Adaptive Management and The Creation Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyses of this type have been underway for several years in B.C. (e.g., Seely et al 2004, Welham et al 2004, Seely 2005a). This work demonstrates that not only can such an approach be practical and operational for the assessment of the relative sustainability of different management strategies: it is also useful for testing the efficacy of existing indicators and suggesting new indicators that can provide practical and affordable monitoring (Seely 2005a, b;Seely and Welham 2006).…”
Section: Process-based Monitoring: the Linkage Of Predictive Monitorimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SFM is increasingly seen as an approach that should engage a wide range of bio-physical, socio-economic, and political aspects (Seely et al, 2004) in a decision making process. However, there are as yet few established models for conducting such a holistic engagement in SFM that shows an increasing need for simulation models and decision support tools (Black et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%