2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2011.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining appropriate forestry extension model: Application of AHP in the Zagros area, Iran

Abstract: Determining an appropriate forestry extension model remains as a major challenge if sustainable forest management is a goal. This article was an attempt to show how the analytical hierarchy process can effectively be helpful in selecting appropriate model for forestry extension. The results revealed that the present situation fails to regard the 'privatized extension' as an appropriate model for the Zagros area in Iran. The results also showed while the beneficiaries select 'cooperative extension system' as th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the weights of 12 factors were well assigned and consistency ratios were calculated using AHP approach. AHP is a useful systematic tool for handling MCDM processes (Yang et al, 2008;Samari et al, 2012). Compared with the methods mentioned above, AHP is a very effective and powerful method to determine the weights.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the weights of 12 factors were well assigned and consistency ratios were calculated using AHP approach. AHP is a useful systematic tool for handling MCDM processes (Yang et al, 2008;Samari et al, 2012). Compared with the methods mentioned above, AHP is a very effective and powerful method to determine the weights.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Al-S. Al-Harbi, 1999). 1) creating hierarchical tree, 2) pairwise comparing of research criteria and options, 3) operations for computing data, 4) sensitivity analysis, and 5) the level of non-adaptability (incompatibility), (D. Samari, et al, 2012).…”
Section: Analytical Hierarchy Process (Ahp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Al-S. Al-Harbi, 1999). 1) creating hierarchical tree, 2) pairwise comparing of research criteria and options, 3) operations for computing data, 4) sensitivity analysis, and 5) the level of non-adaptability (incompatibility), (D. Samari, et al, 2012). Steps 1 and 2 are made on the basis of the decision maker's knowledge and understanding of the problem and steps 3 to 5 are executed using an appropriate software, such as the Expert Choice (Peltola, et al, 2002).…”
Section: Analytical Hierarchy Process (Ahp)mentioning
confidence: 99%