2017
DOI: 10.15294/jpii.v6i1.9600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Analysis of Students Scientific Reasoning Ability in Solving the Modified Lawson Classroom Test of Scientific Reasoning (MLCTSR) Problems by Applying the Levels of Inquiry

Abstract: This study aims to determine the students' achievement in answering modified lawson classroom test of scientific reasoning (MLCTSR) questions in overall science teaching and by every aspect of scientific reasoning abilities. There are six aspects related to the scientific reasoning abilities that were measured; they are conservatorial reasoning, proportional reasoning, controlling variables, combinatorial reasoning, probabilistic reasoning, correlational reasoning. The research is also conducted to see the dev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
7
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Scientific reasoning ability can be developed with implementation of heuristic methods on discovery learning models. The results of this study is like other studies that the level of reasoning can be improved by learning activities with testing hypothesis or theory procedures (Lawson, 2004;Erlina et al, 2016;Wu et al, 2016;Novia & Riandi , 2017). Scientific reasoning patterns of experimental group show Figure 5.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Scientific reasoning ability can be developed with implementation of heuristic methods on discovery learning models. The results of this study is like other studies that the level of reasoning can be improved by learning activities with testing hypothesis or theory procedures (Lawson, 2004;Erlina et al, 2016;Wu et al, 2016;Novia & Riandi , 2017). Scientific reasoning patterns of experimental group show Figure 5.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The results of this study are in line with [13], [14] statement that reasoning and proofing abilities are very important for building students' understanding of mathematical concepts. Leithner in [8] mentions that reasoning is the foundation of mathematics, unfortunately, students at all grade levels find it difficult in mathematical reasoning problem including undergraduate students of mathematical majors.…”
Section: Ability To Find Patterns or Properties Of A Mathematical Phenomenon To Make Generalizationssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The steps of the model include 1) observation, 2) manipulation, 3) generalization, 4) verification, and 5) application [27]. This learning-based inquiry is positively correlated with the ability of scientific reasoning, in which students are required to follow a process that is systematic and purposeful, beginning with identifying a problem, proposing a hypothesis, identifying variables, conducting an experiment, analyzing data, and drawing valid conclusions [28]. The model characteristics indicate that the students must conduct experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%