Abstract:Over the past few decades, there has been renewed interest in the social economy, especially in relation to the employment crisis and the reshaping of State's interventions. The social economy plays an important role in solving new social problems with pioneering solutions, especially in the field of public services. It is important to better understand its innovative function. This article discusses the notion of social innovation and explains how it can be used as an analytical framework for understanding th… Show more
“…However, in spite of this direct link, it is noteworthy to mention that the two variables do not depend on each other. This review found several authors who discuss social innovation without mentioning social entrepreneurship (Adams & Hess, 2010;Bouchard, 2012;Cajaiba-Santana, 2014;Froud et al, 2010;Linton, 2009;Spena & de Chiara, 2012). Additionally, social entrepreneurship is critical with respect to social issues, but it is not a key determinant of social innovation (Dawson & Daniel, 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the papers reviewed, several authors discuss the relationship between social innovation and social development. They coincide in that both social innovation and social development seek to strengthen social structure and that social innovation facilitates social development (Adams & Hess, 2010;Bouchard, 2012;Cajaiba-Santana, 2014;Dacin et al, 2011;Dawson & Daniel, 2010;Froud et al, 2010;Maak & Stoetter, 2012).…”
Section: Methodology: Scoping Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For other authors, social innovation basically refers to the development of new strategies or tools that acquire relevance with the improvement of social welfare and the creation of value for society (Adams & Hess, 2010;Bouchard, 2012;Cajaiba-Santana, 2014;Dawson & Daniel, 2010). Moreover, social innovation can be understood as a collective process that involves social ability (López-Isaza , 2014).…”
Purpose: The paper provides an extensive, comprehensive and up-to-date qualitative scoping literature review of financial inclusion and other related concepts, and focuses in particular on the Colombian context, and the accessibility as well as barriers to banking services. It structures the themes and dimensions of scholarly debates on financial inclusion in the literature highlighting avenues for future research to fill various gaps.
Design/methodology:This scoping literature review rigorously identifies the most relevant research and variables pertaining to financial inclusion and social innovation.Findings: Based on a scoping literature review, a comprehensive framework of key concepts of financial inclusion, scholarly contributions, countries and variables is presented.
Research limitations/implications:Owing to the methodological approach of this paper and its rather theoretical nature, this research seeks to enrich scientific debates pertaining to the empirical data displayed, especially on the case of Colombia.
Practical implications:The most central variables that are linked to the theme of financial inclusion are explored, and hence this paper forms a basis for future qualitative and quantitative studies.
Social implications:This research article contributes to public policy making on financial inclusion aimed at reducing levels of socio-economic inequality.-582-Intangible Capital -https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.946 Originality/value: In business and management research a degree of conceptual confusion prevails on the theme of financial inclusion. This paper attempts to clarify different types of variables and one country specific case to provide more solid analytical tools for scholars and analysts.
“…However, in spite of this direct link, it is noteworthy to mention that the two variables do not depend on each other. This review found several authors who discuss social innovation without mentioning social entrepreneurship (Adams & Hess, 2010;Bouchard, 2012;Cajaiba-Santana, 2014;Froud et al, 2010;Linton, 2009;Spena & de Chiara, 2012). Additionally, social entrepreneurship is critical with respect to social issues, but it is not a key determinant of social innovation (Dawson & Daniel, 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the papers reviewed, several authors discuss the relationship between social innovation and social development. They coincide in that both social innovation and social development seek to strengthen social structure and that social innovation facilitates social development (Adams & Hess, 2010;Bouchard, 2012;Cajaiba-Santana, 2014;Dacin et al, 2011;Dawson & Daniel, 2010;Froud et al, 2010;Maak & Stoetter, 2012).…”
Section: Methodology: Scoping Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For other authors, social innovation basically refers to the development of new strategies or tools that acquire relevance with the improvement of social welfare and the creation of value for society (Adams & Hess, 2010;Bouchard, 2012;Cajaiba-Santana, 2014;Dawson & Daniel, 2010). Moreover, social innovation can be understood as a collective process that involves social ability (López-Isaza , 2014).…”
Purpose: The paper provides an extensive, comprehensive and up-to-date qualitative scoping literature review of financial inclusion and other related concepts, and focuses in particular on the Colombian context, and the accessibility as well as barriers to banking services. It structures the themes and dimensions of scholarly debates on financial inclusion in the literature highlighting avenues for future research to fill various gaps.
Design/methodology:This scoping literature review rigorously identifies the most relevant research and variables pertaining to financial inclusion and social innovation.Findings: Based on a scoping literature review, a comprehensive framework of key concepts of financial inclusion, scholarly contributions, countries and variables is presented.
Research limitations/implications:Owing to the methodological approach of this paper and its rather theoretical nature, this research seeks to enrich scientific debates pertaining to the empirical data displayed, especially on the case of Colombia.
Practical implications:The most central variables that are linked to the theme of financial inclusion are explored, and hence this paper forms a basis for future qualitative and quantitative studies.
Social implications:This research article contributes to public policy making on financial inclusion aimed at reducing levels of socio-economic inequality.-582-Intangible Capital -https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.946 Originality/value: In business and management research a degree of conceptual confusion prevails on the theme of financial inclusion. This paper attempts to clarify different types of variables and one country specific case to provide more solid analytical tools for scholars and analysts.
“…Thus, the analytical dimensions of social innovations proposed by Tardif and Harrison (2005) and the classification of the actors developed by Rollin and Vincent (2007) can be considered adequate for understanding the formation of collective enterprises in the handicraft sector, since they permit the identification of the main elements within the solutions developed with a considerable number of actors, which had previously been noted by Bouchard (2012). The studied social innovations sought primarily to meet the income generation, employment and, in some cases, the social needs of the individuals involved.…”
Social innovations are seen as alternatives to address social and environmental problems facing humanity. However, the term covers a broad range of definitions which can include a variety of initiatives. Based on analytical dimensions of social innovations, this study sought to assess to what extent the emergence of collective enterprises in the Brazilian handicraft sector is consistent with the dimensions postulated in the literature. Drawing on a multiple case study, the results showed that the analytical dimensions of social innovation identified the main elements involved in developing solutions with a significant number of actors, which indicates they are appropriate for understanding the formation of collective enterprises in the handicraft sector. This study has enabled, therefore, an understanding of how social solutions are built collectively and can be used to generate other social innovations or improvements to existing ones.
“…It consists of a network with the participation of actors from the public, private and third sectors with complementary objectives, building social cohesion, changing social relations, and proposing new cultural orientations (Bouchard, 2012).…”
1The authors would like to thank all of the respondents who agreed to share their knowledge and valuable experience, contributing to this research and consequently making it possible.• RAM, REV.
ABSTRACTObjective: To explore and understand the Family Agro-Industry Clusters from the social innovation perspective. Originality/gap/relevance/implications: Social innovation allows us to understand how global issues can be resolved based on local elements. The originality of this study is in the analysis of the cluster as a social innovation, highlighting its formation impacts decisively in the economic and social development of the region in which they operate.
Main methodological aspects:This study had emphasis on semi-structured interviews with governance members from the investigated cluster, as well as on the analysis of the governance meeting minutes since the emergence of the clusters. The analysis of the collected content was performed with NVivo 11 software. Summary of key findings: Social innovation was analyzed based on the viewpoint of the process, network formation, planning, governance, and results. These categories from the theoretical framework enabled the Family Agro-Industry cluster from social innovation to be explained. Key considerations/conclusions: Results indicate that the clusters of Family Agro-Industry analyzed can be considered a social innovation because they have the necessary elements for its characterization, emphasizing the governance as a central construct and culture of coalition with actors from the public, private and third sectors in finding solutions for social needs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.