1994
DOI: 10.1049/el:19940930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple technique for measuring cavity loss in semiconductor lasers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…30 The values of total loss were determined through the TE-TM-gain-crossing method previously applied to telecommunication lasers. 31 Similar total losses were obtained from the long-wavelength modal gain saturation values 32 (see Figure 6). The internal loss, cc^t, and the device internal efficiency, riint, were calculated using measured slope efficiency and known device mirror loss ot m .…”
Section: High-power Room-temperature Cw Diode Lasers Operating In Thesupporting
confidence: 67%
“…30 The values of total loss were determined through the TE-TM-gain-crossing method previously applied to telecommunication lasers. 31 Similar total losses were obtained from the long-wavelength modal gain saturation values 32 (see Figure 6). The internal loss, cc^t, and the device internal efficiency, riint, were calculated using measured slope efficiency and known device mirror loss ot m .…”
Section: High-power Room-temperature Cw Diode Lasers Operating In Thesupporting
confidence: 67%
“…A technique based on below-bandgap measurements [34,35] is made difficult by the low intensity of ASE in this region, which limits the accuracy of the gain measurements. For the gain spectra shown in Fig.…”
Section: Measurement Of the Optical Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2(b) shows the laser spectrum, whose central wavelength was 1490 nm. The modal loss ␣ i was estimated as 28 cm −1 , using Hakki-Paoli measurements below the bandgap [15]. The measured values of diff and ␣ i correspond to an internal quantum efficiency of 0.54.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%