2017
DOI: 10.1109/tcad.2017.2648839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shrunk-2-D: A Physical Design Methodology to Build Commercial-Quality Monolithic 3-D ICs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the design is partitioned into two tiers using a modified version of Shrunk-2D [17]. We start with a placed and routed 2D design that satisfies timing constraints.…”
Section: B Design Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, the design is partitioned into two tiers using a modified version of Shrunk-2D [17]. We start with a placed and routed 2D design that satisfies timing constraints.…”
Section: B Design Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This results in the overlap of standard cells. The standard cells are then partitioned into two tiers to remove the overlap by defining regular partitioning grids, and performing an area-balanced global min-cut [17]. We scale the placement coordinates instead of standard cell dimensions, as proposed in [17], since this method does not require modification to standard cell and technology LEF, which can be time-consuming and error-prone.…”
Section: B Design Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This option has recently gained more attention [39], [40], [41], mainly thanks to advances of the processing technology [42]. The key feature of monolithic 3D ICs is that active layers are sequentially manufactured into one chip rather than bonded using separate dies.…”
Section: Monolithic 3d Icsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For placement, routing, and design closure of monolithic 3D ICs, the reuse of commercial 2D physical design tools has been demonstrated to lower the barrier for industry-wide acceptance [40], [47], [48], [49]. Nevertheless, due to its sequential processing nature, such 3D ICs cannot apply "plug-and-play" in- * 2 For example, the micro-bump bonding in TSV-based 3D ICs may be underfilled with BCB polymer layers.…”
Section: Monolithic 3d Icsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to their oorplanning methodology, they can achieve temperatures comparable or even smaller than the ones obtained with 2D technology [198], by using 2D oorplanning for creating 3D integrated designs using monolithic 3D [199]. Their process can achieve up to 12% and 8% power savings for a single block and SoC, respectively, when compared with their 2-D counterparts implemented using commercial tools.…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%