2006
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2006.092437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prospective, non-randomised, long term clinical evaluation of a foldable hydrophilic single piece intraocular lens: results of the Centerflex FDA study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is manufactured from the same material used in the C-flex IOL (Rayner Intraocular Lenses Ltd.), which was approved for sale by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for in-the-bag implantation. [18][19][20] One problem reported with initial piggyback implantation of IOLs is the formation of ILO. 8,9 Several methods to prevent ILO, including creation of a relatively large capsulorhexis and implantation of the piggyback IOL in the ciliary sulcus rather than in the capsular bag, have been shown to decrease the incidence of this complication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is manufactured from the same material used in the C-flex IOL (Rayner Intraocular Lenses Ltd.), which was approved for sale by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for in-the-bag implantation. [18][19][20] One problem reported with initial piggyback implantation of IOLs is the formation of ILO. 8,9 Several methods to prevent ILO, including creation of a relatively large capsulorhexis and implantation of the piggyback IOL in the ciliary sulcus rather than in the capsular bag, have been shown to decrease the incidence of this complication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was to address previous observations of the lack of barrier effect against PCO at the level of the optic-haptic junctions of other 1-piece hydrophobic or hydrophilic acrylic designs. [11][12][13] The aim of this study was to assess uveal and capsular biocompatibility of the new 1-piece hydrophobic acrylic IOL in the rabbit model.…”
Section: Abmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PCO data were then compared to 36 Centerflex IOL images of 36 patients who had participated in a previous FDA study. 1 The C-flex and Centerflex groups were matched in terms of inclusion/exclusion criteria, age distribution, and follow-up time (6 and 12 months).…”
Section: Postoperative Examination and Posterior Capsule Opacificatiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the sharp optic edge design excludes the optic-haptic junction. 1 Experimental studies of single-piece IOLs show that the lack of a sharp edge at this junction might be a gateway for migrating lens epithelial cells (LECs), thus contributing to higher levels of posterior capsule opacification (PCO). 2,3 According to our Heidelberg PCO database, 4 eyes with Centerflex IOLs have lower PCO values than eyes with IOLs with round optic edges but have higher PCO scores than eyes with hydrophobic IOLs with sharp optic edges.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation