2012
DOI: 10.1590/s1519-99402012000300019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Propriedades físicas e sensoriais da carne suína PSE

Abstract: Objetivou-se avaliar as características físicas e sensoriais da carne suína PSE, suas correlações e os prejuízos causados para a indústria, em função de sua ocorrência. Em abatedouro comercial aferiu-se o pH das carcaças (n=1601) aos 45 minutos post mortem (pH45), classificou-as em PSE (pH45<5,8) ou normais (pH45≥5,8). Após 24 horas de resfriamento, foram coletadas amostras do músculo Longissimus dorsi de 26 carcaças PSE e 26 normais, que foram avaliadas quanto à coloração (L*, a*, b*), perda de exsudato, p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
8
0
7

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
8
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The water retention capacity was not affected by the type of feeding system, the mean value among the treatments, 99.8%, can be considered suitable fot this variable. It is known that there is a high and positive correlation between the water retention capacity and the succulence (Caldara et al, 2012) of the meat and this fact was verified in the present study, considering that the meat of the goats also presented adequate value for succulence (Table 1). Means followed by distinct letters in the same line differ significantly by Turkey 5%.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The water retention capacity was not affected by the type of feeding system, the mean value among the treatments, 99.8%, can be considered suitable fot this variable. It is known that there is a high and positive correlation between the water retention capacity and the succulence (Caldara et al, 2012) of the meat and this fact was verified in the present study, considering that the meat of the goats also presented adequate value for succulence (Table 1). Means followed by distinct letters in the same line differ significantly by Turkey 5%.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Fernandes et al (2016) did not find differences when evaluating the influence of the commercialization form on the chemical composition of the meat. (Table 3) and it showed similar averages to those found by Barbosa et al (2006) and like the ones attributed by Fox et al (1980) and Caldara et al (2012) for pork in PSE condition (< 5.8). The pH value of the meat influences protein denaturation, myofibrils distention and muscle cell shrinkage.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Published L* values for regular pork vary widely (CALDArA et al, 2012). L* values from 49 to 60 meet pork quality standards established by the American Meat Science Association (AMSA, 2001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%