2019
DOI: 10.24235/sc.educatia.v8i1.4081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Profile of Junior High School Students' Critical Thinking Skills in Answering Questions Related to Biological Concepts

Abstract: There are indication that the implementation of education in various places in Indonesia is still not optimally empowering students' critical thinking skills (CTS). The aimed of this quantitative study was about 1) to survey the CTS of junior high school students in the Malang, and 2) to know whether or not there were differences in CTS between students in different grades. The measurement of CTS in this study used an integrated critical thinking assessment of the essay test. Mean score and one-way ANOVA were … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One of these factors is the lack of ability to face higher order thinking skills questions by most students. As a result, students are less accustomed to using their thinking skills (Fauzi et al, 2019). Teachers can improve students' argument analysis skills by asking questions that stimulate students to argue, compare their arguments with other arguments, and provide opportunities for students to express opinions about the discussion being studied (Fuadi et al, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of these factors is the lack of ability to face higher order thinking skills questions by most students. As a result, students are less accustomed to using their thinking skills (Fauzi et al, 2019). Teachers can improve students' argument analysis skills by asking questions that stimulate students to argue, compare their arguments with other arguments, and provide opportunities for students to express opinions about the discussion being studied (Fuadi et al, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was found that the rubric was able to accommodate the assessment of FRISCO critical thinking indicators (focus, reason, inference, situation, clarity, and overview). Other researchers from different institutions have also put an interest in the implementation of this rubric due to its high practicality value, for example, researchers from Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang whose studies involved either university students [42]or junior high school students [43].…”
Section: Results and Discustionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) Mengajar dan mempelajari konten abad ke-21; pendidik perlu mengintegrasikan pengetahuan dan keterampilan di abad ke-21 (Swandi, Amin, & Muin, 2018). Guru adalah faktor utama yang berkontribusi pada pembelajaran abad ke-21 yang memiliki empat aspek, yaitu 1) kreativitas, 2) berpikir kritis, 3) komunikasi, 4) kolaborasi (Fauzi, 2019;Janetos, 2020;Muhlisin, 2017;Suganda & Purwianiangsih, 2020).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified