2017
DOI: 10.1590/1678-4499.084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plot size and number of repetitions in vetch

Abstract: The optimum plot size to evaluate the fresh matter weight of vetch is 4.52 m 2 at the 3 sowing densities. Four repetitions, to evaluate up to 50 treatments, in completely randomized and randomized block designs, are enough to identify as significant, at 5% probability by Tukey's test, differences between treatment means of 29.15% of the experiment average.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, a plot size of up to ten BEU (10 m 2 ) is suggested for evaluating the fresh weight of single-crop or intercropped black oats and vetch, as the gain in experimental precision (a decrease in VU (X) ) with the increase in plot size starting from ten BEU was negligible. This value of 10 m 2 is relatively greater than the plot size of 4.14 m 2 determined to evaluate the fresh weight of black oats (CARGNELUTTI FILHO et al, 2014a) and of 4.52 m 2 to assess the fresh weight of vetch (CARGNELUTTI FILHO et al, 2017). It should be considered that these authors used another methodology, i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As such, a plot size of up to ten BEU (10 m 2 ) is suggested for evaluating the fresh weight of single-crop or intercropped black oats and vetch, as the gain in experimental precision (a decrease in VU (X) ) with the increase in plot size starting from ten BEU was negligible. This value of 10 m 2 is relatively greater than the plot size of 4.14 m 2 determined to evaluate the fresh weight of black oats (CARGNELUTTI FILHO et al, 2014a) and of 4.52 m 2 to assess the fresh weight of vetch (CARGNELUTTI FILHO et al, 2017). It should be considered that these authors used another methodology, i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Although, plot size was investigated using the maximum curvature of the model of the coefficient of variation (PARANAÍBA et al, 2009) in the single cultivation of black oats (CARGNELUTTI FILHO et al, 2014a) and vetch (CARGNELUTTI FILHO et al, 2017), it is assumed that intercropping, commonly used with ground cover plants, can generate distinct patterns of experimental design, and that the use of this approach can combine information for planning experiments with these two ground cover species.…”
Section: Crop Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plot size has been investigated in sole cropping of black oat (CARGNELUTTI FILHO et al, 2014a), common vetch (CARGNELUTTI FILHO et al, 2017) and forage turnip (CARGNELUTTI FILHO et al, 2011, 2016, through the method of maximum curvature of the coefficient of variation model (PARANAÍBA; FERREIRA; MORAIS, 2009a) and also in forage turnip (CARGNELUTTI FILHO et al, 2014b) and black oat with common vetch (CARGNELUTTI FILHO et al, 2020) through the methodologies of Smith (1938) and Hatheway (1961).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O tamanho ótimo de parcela e/ou o número de repetições têm sido investigados para culturas agrícolas, tais como a alfafa (Freitas et al, 2011), o arroz (Masood & Raza, 2012), trigo (Al-Feel & Abdulaah, 2013), aveia-preta (Cargnelutti Filho et al, 2014), ervilha forrageira (Cargnelutti Filho et al, 2015), milheto (Burin et al, 2016), feijão guandu (Santos et al, 2016), aveia branca (Lavezo et al, 2017), crotalária juncea (Facco et al, 2017), ervilhaca (Cargnelutti Filho et al, 2017) e centeio (Chaves et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified