2018
DOI: 10.5039/agraria.v13i3a5563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tamanho de parcela e número de repetições para avaliação de caracteres vegetativos em centeio

Abstract: RESUMO: Os objetivos deste trabalho foram determinar o tamanho ótimo de parcela (Xo) e o número de repetições para avaliar as massas de matéria fresca e seca de centeio (Secale cereale L.), e investigar a variação do Xo entre duas cultivares e cinco épocas de semeadura. Foram conduzidos 30 ensaios de uniformidade. Cada ensaio com dimensões de 6 × 4 m foi dividido em 24 unidades experimentais básicas (UEB) de 1 × 1 m. Foram avaliadas as massas de matéria fresca e seca de centeio nas 720 UEB. O Xo foi determinad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of replicates varied between 3.95 and 32.27 (Tables 3 and 4), depending on the experimental design, the number of treatments (i), and the minimum differences (d). As already described [Cargnelutti Filho et al (2014a, 2020; Burin et al (2015); Chaves et al (2018); Lavezo et al (2018); and Toebe et al (2020aToebe et al ( , 2020b], the greater is the term i, and the lower is the d, the greater will be the number of replicates. In this sense, the use of five, six, seven, and eight replicates is sufficient to identify differences Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The number of replicates varied between 3.95 and 32.27 (Tables 3 and 4), depending on the experimental design, the number of treatments (i), and the minimum differences (d). As already described [Cargnelutti Filho et al (2014a, 2020; Burin et al (2015); Chaves et al (2018); Lavezo et al (2018); and Toebe et al (2020aToebe et al ( , 2020b], the greater is the term i, and the lower is the d, the greater will be the number of replicates. In this sense, the use of five, six, seven, and eight replicates is sufficient to identify differences Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The number of replicates has been defined in scenarios formed by combinations of differences among means to be detected as significant by Tukey's test and the number of treatments, in an iterative process until convergence, according to the method described by Cargnelutti Filho et al (2014a). These two methods have been applied in experimental planning to determine the fresh weight of forage crops (Cargnelutti Filho et al, 2014a, 2020Burin et al, 2015;Chaves et al, 2018;Lavezo et al, 2018;Toebe et al, 2020b). These methods have been also applied for the determination of plot size and the number of replicates, to evaluate the fresh weight of broadcastseeded ryegrass (Toebe et al, 2020a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In white oats the plot sizes for fresh and dry weight were 1.66 m 2 and 1.73 m 2 respectively (Lavezo et al, 2018). The optimal plot sizes to evaluate fresh and dry weight in rye were 3.43 m 2 and 3.82 m 2 respectively (Chaves et al, 2018b). To evaluate grain yield, the plot size for white oats was 1.57 m 2 (Lavezo et al, 2017) and for rye it was 6.08 m 2 (Chaves et al, 2018a).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal plot size can be determined by the maximum curvature method of the model of the coefficient of variation (Paranaíba, Ferreira, & Morais, 2009), and the number of replications by the methodology described in Cargnelutti et al (2014). These two methodologies have been used to determine the optimal plot size and the number of replications to evaluate fresh weight in black oats (Cargnelutti et al, 2014) and millet (Burin et al, 2015 ;Burin, Cargnelutti, Alves, Toebe, & Kleinpaul, 2016), fresh and dry weight in white oats (Lavezo et al, 2018) and rye (Chaves et al, 2018b), and grain yield in white oats (Lavezo et al, 2017) and rye (Chaves et al, 2018a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher LOM contents found in the 10-20 cm layer in T5 and T6 may be due to the use of rye as soil cover plants. This plant has high capacity to generate dry matter (DM) (17 to 35 Mg ha -1 ) with high C/N, which improved the quantity of DM in the soil surface layer of the treatment T5 (Table 3) (Chaves et al, 2018). In addition, the rye root system is regularly renewed and tends to deposit organic material in deep soil layers (Loss et al, 2015).…”
Section: Light Organic Matter (Lom) Lom-c and Lom-n Contentsmentioning
confidence: 99%