2016
DOI: 10.1109/tcad.2016.2524540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physics-Based Electromigration Models and Full-Chip Assessment for Power Grid Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2.2). We remark that the three-phase EM model is more consistent with the measured wire resistance change over time than existing physics-based EM models such as [15,26,29], which do not consider the incubation time. The incubation time, which is the time between nucleation time and the time when the wire resistance changes, can be significant for the overall time-to-failure (TTF) analysis and is dependent on the wire structure as well.…”
Section: The Three-phase Physics-based Compact Em Model For Multi-segsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2.2). We remark that the three-phase EM model is more consistent with the measured wire resistance change over time than existing physics-based EM models such as [15,26,29], which do not consider the incubation time. The incubation time, which is the time between nucleation time and the time when the wire resistance changes, can be significant for the overall time-to-failure (TTF) analysis and is dependent on the wire structure as well.…”
Section: The Three-phase Physics-based Compact Em Model For Multi-segsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…In the existing physics-based EM models, the EM failure process in general can be viewed as two phases: the nucleation phase, in which the void is generated after the critical stress is reached, and the growth phase, in which the void starts to grow. Existing compact EM models are also versed in terms of the two phases, where each phase is described by timeto-failure (TTF) as a function of current density and other parameters [15,32]. However, such a simple EM model ignores the fact that when the void is nucleated or formed, it will not change the wire's resistance immediately.…”
Section: The Three-phase Physics-based Compact Em Model For Multi-segmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The time for void nucleation due to EM in a metal line can be expressed as a function of the stress σ T induced in that line [14]. The void nucleation time is defined as an instant in time when the stress at the cathode end of the metal line reaches critical stress (σ crit ) and expressed as:…”
Section: B Em Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where MTTF stress is the MTTF in the accelerated-stressed condition. Here, T stress is 600 K, j stress is 3 MA/cm 2 , and E a is 0.86 eV [14]. The current density in a voltage-rail segment is obtained using simulation and the MTTF of the top tier is estimated as the MTTF of the weakest link in that tier.…”
Section: B Em Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%