2012 IEEE International SOI Conference (SOI) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/soi.2012.6404394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Origin of wide retention distribution in 1T Floating Body RAM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16 shows that similar retention time distributions are obtained for the different type of devices evaluated suggesting similar traps, and generation/recombination (GR) centers distributions. 33) For logic UTBB planar devices (see Fig. 17), the two doping approaches (with and without extensions I/I) yield results in line with those obtained for FinFETs and for 1T-FBRAM UTBB devices.…”
Section: Device Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…16 shows that similar retention time distributions are obtained for the different type of devices evaluated suggesting similar traps, and generation/recombination (GR) centers distributions. 33) For logic UTBB planar devices (see Fig. 17), the two doping approaches (with and without extensions I/I) yield results in line with those obtained for FinFETs and for 1T-FBRAM UTBB devices.…”
Section: Device Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…observed experimentally [21]. More important is that interface states are strongly related, via the trap capture cross-section (σ) dependence with the trap energy [22], with the wide retention time variability observed in capacitorless cells [23], [24]. Since retention time in long Z 2 -FETs is driven by the SRH generation at the anode-body junction [4], reducing the surface recombination velocity negatively impacts this figure of merit.…”
Section: B Retention Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variation of 0.1 eV in the trap energy level in the Si band gap results in a change of about two orders of magnitude difference in the retention time. Moreover, defects closer to the silicon mid-gap can be detrimental for the retention time [28,29]. Fig.…”
Section: Retention Time Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%