Handbook of Organizational Creativity 2012
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-374714-3.00026-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organizational Development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(57 reference statements)
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Brainstorming is clearly relevant for idea generation, but without teamwork, this tool is of little value in shifting ideas into innovative outputs. This view coincides with the current questioning of the usefulness of brainstorming (Basadur, Basadur, & Gordana, 2012;Gobble, 2014).…”
Section: Ambidexterity Of Creativity Mechanisms At the Team Levelsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Brainstorming is clearly relevant for idea generation, but without teamwork, this tool is of little value in shifting ideas into innovative outputs. This view coincides with the current questioning of the usefulness of brainstorming (Basadur, Basadur, & Gordana, 2012;Gobble, 2014).…”
Section: Ambidexterity Of Creativity Mechanisms At the Team Levelsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Different authors (see for example Amabile, 1996;Basadur, Basadur, & Licina, 2012;Csikszentmihalyi, 2011;Ma, 2009) have proposed models of stages in the creative process, such as: 1) preparation stage, with immersion in the problems inherent in a task and/or in something that arouses curiosity; 2) incubation stage, with formulation of problems or conceptualization of hypothesis; 3) generation of solutions or assembling the pieces of a puzzle (Csikszentmihalyi, 2011); 4) generation of criteria to evaluate appropriate solutions, involving communication, evaluation, modification and/or validation of ideas for the solution of the problem; and 5) selection, solution, and application, involving decision making or implementation of the proposed solution (product, ideas and practices) or innovation (Amabile, 2013;Basadur et al, 2012;Hammond et al, 2011). This last stage can be included in a process of combining the categories or reorganizing knowledge depending on the complexity of the problem.…”
Section: Creativity As a Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus it is ironic that this literature is often ignored in reviews of team innovation (e.g., Hülsheger et al, 2009 ; van Knippenberg, 2017 ), presumably in part because of its predominant focus on the idea generation or brainstorming process, and because these do not involve “real people” in real world contexts. Others suggest that the brainstorming process is not an effective means of enhancing organizational innovation, based on the experience of organizational development consultants ( Skilton and Dooley, 2010 ; Basadur et al, 2012 ). However, that reflects a misunderstanding of the focus and contributions of the scientific literature on collaborative idea generation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%