Proceedings International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design
DOI: 10.1109/isqed.2002.996729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal sequencing energy allocation for CMOS integrated systems

Abstract: All synchronous CMOS integrated systems have to pay some sequencing overhead. This overhead includes the skew and the jitter of the clock. It also includes the setup time and the clock-to-output delay of the flip-flops. This paper discusses how much energy should be allocated for sequencing in these systems. It is pointed out that providing too little energy is just as bad as providing too much. It is also argued that directly trying to minimize the energy-delay product of the sequencing subsystem is practical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be satisfied with reasonably low hardware overhead. In addition, the clock uncertainty resulting from the variation of the duty cycle can be partially absorbed by the storage element [32]. The two fundamental ways of building dual-edge CSEs are the latch-mux and flip-flop, as shown in Figures 17(a) and 17(b).…”
Section: Dual-edge Triggeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be satisfied with reasonably low hardware overhead. In addition, the clock uncertainty resulting from the variation of the duty cycle can be partially absorbed by the storage element [32]. The two fundamental ways of building dual-edge CSEs are the latch-mux and flip-flop, as shown in Figures 17(a) and 17(b).…”
Section: Dual-edge Triggeringmentioning
confidence: 99%