1966
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1966.tb05623.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Stem‐Cell Recovery after Irradiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1966
1966
1982
1982

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results suggest that the in vitro colony-forming cells could be members of the population of larger cells in the bone marrow, a conclusion in agreement with recent results of Fox and Lajtha (personal communication) indicating that in vitro colony-forming cells are dividing cells in vivo. Porteous and Lajtha (1966) followed the recovery of the repopulating capacity of femur and spleen cells (in vivo colony-forming cells) following a dose of 150 rads. Regeneration in the bone marrow and spleen followed the same pattern although at any one time the femur had a greater repopulating capacity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results suggest that the in vitro colony-forming cells could be members of the population of larger cells in the bone marrow, a conclusion in agreement with recent results of Fox and Lajtha (personal communication) indicating that in vitro colony-forming cells are dividing cells in vivo. Porteous and Lajtha (1966) followed the recovery of the repopulating capacity of femur and spleen cells (in vivo colony-forming cells) following a dose of 150 rads. Regeneration in the bone marrow and spleen followed the same pattern although at any one time the femur had a greater repopulating capacity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our experiments have concentrated on the initial 24 h after irradiation. Most previous studies [3,8,11] have primarily examined longer post-irradiation time spans. We found a slight initial rise in survival if the cells were maintained in situ for one to 2 h post-irradiation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PHA was given to groups of animals at various times so that at the time of sacrifice all donors were on the 7th day of fasting but at 1, 2, 3 or 4 days from the time of PH injection. Cell suspension were made as de scribed by Porteous and Lajtha [15] and the cell concentration adjusted so that 105 bone marrow cells or 10« spleen cells were contained in 0.05 ml and these cell doses were used in all cases. An aplastic hemopoietic condition in the recipients was induced by the administration of 350 ml/kg of Cyclophosphamide (Endoxan, ASTA) and 50 ml/kg of Busulfan (Myleran, Borroughs Wellcome & Co.) as de scribed by Santos and H aghshenass [18].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the increase of the response to EP caused by PHA pretreatment may be considered to reflect an increased number of stem cells in the splenic compartment, whether they are the pluripotential hematopoietic precur sors [15] or the erythroid committed precursors [2,17,21]. If this were the case then one would expect a similar increase in the concentration of erythroid precursors in the marrow.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%