2018
DOI: 10.1109/tthz.2017.2778499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear Analysis of Nonresonant THz Response of MOSFET and Implementation of a High-Responsivity Cross-Coupled THz Detector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, the rectified output current of the GFET THz detector will be modeled using the nonlinear properties of the GFET as expressed by a second-order Taylor expansion of the dc I-V characteristics of the GFET [27], i. e.,…”
Section: Electrical Nonlinear Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this section, the rectified output current of the GFET THz detector will be modeled using the nonlinear properties of the GFET as expressed by a second-order Taylor expansion of the dc I-V characteristics of the GFET [27], i. e.,…”
Section: Electrical Nonlinear Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it is necessary to vary frequency, bias, temperature, and other conditions to distinguish between different types of detection mechanisms. For example, the bias dependence of the detector responsivity was analysed by Khan et al [27] at 500 GHz and by Sun et al [28] at 900 GHz for This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. For more information, see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ antenna-coupled CMOS detectors and GaN HEMT detectors, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rectification process or the so‐called self‐mixing takes place only in a small part of the channel [7]. As demonstrated in [8], a drain‐driven detector shows a relatively higher response among cooled (drain zero‐biased) detectors, which is more significant in a differential antenna‐coupled detector of Fig. 1 b due to an improved DC current.…”
Section: Design Parameters Of Direct Detectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For resistive self-mixing FETs, a close antenna-detector co-design, taking into account antenna efficiency and antenna-detector impedance matching, is realized in [26]- [28] by extending the Dyakonov and Shur plasma-wave theory [29] for an accurate system responsivity and NEP prediction. Alternatively, FETs can also be optimized using non-physical Taylor expansions or Volterra series [25], [30], [31]. The NEP of the SBDs, presented in [18], [19], and diode connected NMOS transistors in [20], were modeled using an equivalent lumped element circuit of a SBD with a high-frequency device analysis approach that was introduced in [32].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%