2015
DOI: 10.1590/0034-737x201562010004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple centroid method to evaluate the adaptability of alfalfa genotypes

Abstract: This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of multiple centroids to study the adaptability of alfalfa genotypes (Medicago sativa L.). In this method, the genotypes are compared with ideotypes defined by the bissegmented regression model, according to the researcher's interest. Thus, genotype classification is carried out as determined by the objective of the researcher and the proposed recommendation strategy. Despite the great potential of the method, it needs to be evaluated under the biological context (wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the adaptability and stability analysis, the first two principal components accounted for over 86% of the total variation (Table 3), which was above the values for alfalfa by the methods of modified centroid (Nascimento et al 2009) and multiple centroid (Nascimento et al 2015), generating a two-dimensional plot of genotype dispersion (Figure 1). Heterogeneous distribution of genotypes was observed for yield; however, some points (genotypes) were very close to four of the seven proposed centroids, allowing the classification of genotypes as maximum general adaptability (ideotype I), minimum adaptability (ideotype IV), mean general adaptability (ideotype V), and mean specific adaptability to favorable environments (ideotype VI).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In the adaptability and stability analysis, the first two principal components accounted for over 86% of the total variation (Table 3), which was above the values for alfalfa by the methods of modified centroid (Nascimento et al 2009) and multiple centroid (Nascimento et al 2015), generating a two-dimensional plot of genotype dispersion (Figure 1). Heterogeneous distribution of genotypes was observed for yield; however, some points (genotypes) were very close to four of the seven proposed centroids, allowing the classification of genotypes as maximum general adaptability (ideotype I), minimum adaptability (ideotype IV), mean general adaptability (ideotype V), and mean specific adaptability to favorable environments (ideotype VI).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…There are methods based on analysis of variance (Plaisted & Peterson, 1959;Wricke, 1965), regression (Cruz, Torres, & Vencovsky, 1989;Eberhart & Russell, 1966;Finlay & Wilkinson, 1963;Tai, 1971;Barroso et al, 2015), nonparametric methods (Lin & Binns, 1988;Rocha, Muro-Abad, Araújo, & Cruz, 2005;Nascimento et al, 2015), linear mixed models Reml/Blup (Resende, 2004), bayesian methods (Couto et al, 2015), and artificial neural networks (Barroso et al, 2013;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coffee Science, 15:e151711, 2020 obtained, using the minimum, medium and maximum performances in favorable and unfavorable environments (Rocha et al, 2005;Nascimento et al, 2015). The clones under evaluation were classified considering the Euclidean distance of each genotype in relation to the known behavior references (centroids), according to the Equation 3: (Laviola et al, 2007).…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%