1979
DOI: 10.2527/jas1979.4861516x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monensin Effects on Diet Digestibility, Ruminal Protein Bypass and Microbial Protein Synthesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
89
3
20

Year Published

1984
1984
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
13
89
3
20
Order By: Relevance
“…Monensin in several studies reduced ruminal protein degradation and consequently decreased microbial protein flow to the small intestine (Poos et al, 1979;Bergen and Bates, 1984). The decrease in ruminal ammonia production when monensin is supplied can be attributed to inhibitory effects on hyper-ammonia-producing bacteria (Eschenlauer et al, 2002) which have peptidase and deaminase activities (Wallace et al, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monensin in several studies reduced ruminal protein degradation and consequently decreased microbial protein flow to the small intestine (Poos et al, 1979;Bergen and Bates, 1984). The decrease in ruminal ammonia production when monensin is supplied can be attributed to inhibitory effects on hyper-ammonia-producing bacteria (Eschenlauer et al, 2002) which have peptidase and deaminase activities (Wallace et al, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the effect of monensin on digestion has been inconsistent in the past. In various in vitro and in vivo studies, monensin has been reported to depress (Poos et al 1979;Mir 1989), to affect minimally (Dinius et al 1976;Lemenager et al 1978;Ricke et al 1984;Faulkner et al 1985) or not at all (Kone and Galyean 1990;Duff et al 1995), and even to increase (Wedegaertner and Johnson 1983) fiber digestibility. Factors such as daily dosage of monensin, ratio of forage to concentrate consumed and differences in ruminal dilution rates or retention times of digesta (Lemenager et al 1978) may also account for this variability.…”
Section: Monensinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concentrations of Pro, Gly, Ser, Thr+amides, Glu and Lys were significantly higher in C than in Mdiets in the second phase. The decrease in amino acid concentrations in the Mdiet.may be related to the fact that protein degradation in the rumen was diminished by monensjn i, 3,5,22)^s shown m our previous paper,4) the number of rumen protozoa were significantly higher in C than in Mdiets. Because protozoa are knownto have a high proteolytic activity, the decreased protozoan population partly resulted in lowered proteolytic activity and decreased free amino acid concentrations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%