2013
DOI: 10.1080/01446193.2013.848994
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement and exploration of individual beliefs about the consequences of building information modelling use

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whilst previous research dealing with industry-specific characteristics and their role in ICT adoption and use has provided important understanding in terms of explaining the role of various knowledge domains (Söderholm, 2006), the mode of organising operations (Croker and Rowlinson, 2007), the focus on control and calculation (Jacobsson and Linderoth, 2010;Davies and Harty, 2013), and national organisational contexts (Gustavsson et al, 2012) to mention a few, this study extends previous knowledge through the development of a framework for industry analysis. More specifically, the paper contributes with illustrations and application of the framework to AEC industry-specific conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whilst previous research dealing with industry-specific characteristics and their role in ICT adoption and use has provided important understanding in terms of explaining the role of various knowledge domains (Söderholm, 2006), the mode of organising operations (Croker and Rowlinson, 2007), the focus on control and calculation (Jacobsson and Linderoth, 2010;Davies and Harty, 2013), and national organisational contexts (Gustavsson et al, 2012) to mention a few, this study extends previous knowledge through the development of a framework for industry analysis. More specifically, the paper contributes with illustrations and application of the framework to AEC industry-specific conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Harty, 2005). On the other hand, looking at research on ICT within the AEC industry, adoption and use seems to be propelled by an opposite reasoning, in terms of self-interest among actors and a focus on control and calculation (Davies and Harty, 2013;Jacobsson andLinderoth, 2010, 2012). Consequently, the current drivers for adoption and use seem to be inconsistent with some of the AEC industry's central characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formal (case A) or informal (case B) communications . Prerequisite (case A) or pre-existing (case B) trust Whilst construction is generally deemed slow in technology absorption (Davies & Harty, 2013), there are encouraging notes that firms actively engage in BIM. Drawing upon the framework of Lambert et al (1996), the partnerships focused on time investment for joint BIM learning during the project, rather than investment in tangible assets, such as acquiring technology or hiring specialized personnel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aligning users' perception with their expectations and believes for the technology adoption will reveal the satisfaction level. These factors are significant for understanding BIM acceptance and use (Davies & Harty 2013).…”
Section: Bim Acceptance In the Construction Industrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resistance happens because of even user's unawareness or un -satisfaction of BIM benefits and advantages (Arayici et al 2011Brewer & Gajendran 2012Lee et al 2013) The acceptance to adopt BIM technology is not a simple case of approval or rejection, various researchers have proposed diverse factors that can influence technology adoption and acceptance. For instance, Davies & Harty (2013) identified that the individual beliefs and expectations regard ing the technology consequence use have important role in successful adoption. Deutsch et al (2011) discussed three change drivers due to technology adoption as people, business, and the technology itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%