2012
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.717-720.1123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Large Area 1200 V SiC BJTs with β&gt;100 and ρ<sub>ON</sub>&lt;3 mΩcm<sup>2</sup>

Abstract: Large (4.3 mm2) area SiC BJTs were demonstrated with a current gain of 117 and a specific on-resistance of 2.8 mΩcm2. The open-base and open-emitter breakdown voltages are stable and with margin sufficient for 1200 V blocking. Fast and tail-current free switching behaviour was shown with rise- and fall-times in the range of 10-30 ns and the SiC BJTs were shown to be rugged in short-circuit and unclamped inductive switching.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 shows the specific ON-resistance of various SiC switches in comparison with modern silicon devices. Of course, this is a simplified view as the devices [14,20,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] NB: For the bipolar devices R ON A was calculated as the voltage drop at a nominal current density divided by the nominal current density For the references other than the indicated see [3] www.ietdl.org…”
Section: Conclusion On Sic-switchesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 shows the specific ON-resistance of various SiC switches in comparison with modern silicon devices. Of course, this is a simplified view as the devices [14,20,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] NB: For the bipolar devices R ON A was calculated as the voltage drop at a nominal current density divided by the nominal current density For the references other than the indicated see [3] www.ietdl.org…”
Section: Conclusion On Sic-switchesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific ON‐resistances of various silicon and SiC switches at 25°C [14, 20, 24–35]NB: For the bipolar devices R ON A was calculated as the voltage drop at a nominal current density divided by the nominal current densityFor the references other than the indicated see [3]…”
Section: Sic‐devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the early 1980 s metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistors (MOSFETs) have successfully replaced traditional silicon bipolar junction transistors (SiC BJT) counterparts because of improvements in input impedance, base storage charge and turn off current tail [1]. However, the recent availability of SiC BJTs has demonstrated fast switching speeds due to lack of the strong conductivity modulation within the structure [2][3][4][5]. This reduces the effective on-state resistance of the SiC BJT to be much lower than a SiC MOSFETs of the same rating.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, ion implantation with the mandatory following high-temperature annealing increases the number of defects which may severely decrease the current gain (β) and reliability of the device under stress conditions [11,12]. Implantation-free devices with very low R ON have been reported which have been fabricated by dry etching and lift-off processes to avoid using ion implantation [13][14][15][16][17][18]. The former devices degrade with increased on-resistance and current capability because of the implantation defects, while the latter have large deviation from the ideal V B mainly because of variations in the etching and doping process steps as well as the misalignments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%