Kebebasan Berpendapat Terhadap Pemerintah Melalui Media Sosial Dalam Perspektif Uu Ite

Rahmawati, Nur; Muslichatun, Muslichatun; Marizal, Muhammad

doi:10.37631/widyapranata.v3i1.270

Cited by 17 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…As supporters of a democratic system that guarantees the preservation of freedom of expression, the government should make every effort to preserve such freedom. If a state is willing to give sufficient protection to the concept of opinion spending, it is regarded as really democratic (Rahmawati, 2021).…”

Section: Article Historymentioning

confidence: 99%

Criminalization Based on the Principle of Human Rights Limitation

Ali

Hafid

Anggraeny

2022

JHN

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction toThe Problem: The use of criminal law to limit the freedom of citizens' civil rights must be done with caution since it intimately links to the infringement of such rights. Purpose/Objective Study: The present study aims to explore the criteria of criminalization based on the principle of limitations of human rights. Design/Methodology/Approach: This study employed doctrinal legal research using both conceptual and statutory approaches Findings: In the policy formation of illegal acts, the legislator frequently formulates rights constraints. The criminalization criteria specified in the human rights limitation can be used to apply this restriction. Restriction-containing offenses determined by the legislature must be by law, legitimate aim, and necessity in a democratic society. A consistent model of criteria for democratic society demands does not exist. This last criterion is linked to both the proportionality principle in human rights and the concept of criminal law as a last resort.

show abstract

Section: Article Historymentioning

confidence: 99%

Criminalization Based on the Principle of Human Rights Limitation

Ali

Hafid

Anggraeny

2022

JHN

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Undang-Undang No.11 Tahun 2008 yang mengatur tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (ITE) membatasi segala aktivitas masyarakat dalam penggunaan internet (Lubis & Maulana, 2010). Jauh sebelum Undang-Undang ITE diresmikan, hal lain yang berhubungan dengan keterbukaan akses informasi adalah kebebasan perpendapat, dimana hal tersebut diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 (Rahmawati et al, 2021).…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Analisis Karakteristik Akun Twitter Berdasarkan Sentimen Pendapat Terkait Undang-Undang PSE

Profesi¹,

Rivaldi

Yudhantorro

et al. 2022

SATIN

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aturan untuk penyedia layanan di internet atau Penyelenggara Sistem Elektronik di Indonesia mendapatkan pro dan kontra semenjak adanya Peraturan Pemerintah yang diterbitkan. Twitter sebagai media sosial, menjadi salah satu tempat menyampaikan pendapat secara bebas, tidak terkecuali pendapat untuk peraturan PSE. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi karakteristik akun pengguna Twitter dengan mempertimbangkan sentimen tweet mereka terhadap Peraturan PSE. Analisis ini dilakukan dengan mengidentifikasi sentimen pada data tweet, kemudian melihat atribut dari akun pengguna tweet tersebut. Pada proses penggalian data didapatkan sebanyak 849 tweet, 679 diantaranya diberikan label sentimen yang kemudian akan digunakan untuk membangun model machine learning berbasis IndoBERT. Selanjutnya, sebanyak 335 data terkait akun pengguna yang terikat dengan data tweet diatas juga didapatkan. Model machine learning yang dihasilkan mencapai akurasi sebesar 71%, didapatkan juga model paling baik dalam mengklasifikasi tweet dengan sentiment negatif. Ditemukan bahwa akun yang mendukung PSE atau memiliki postingan tweet dengan sentimen positif berusia lebih muda dibandingkan yang bersentimen negatif. Meski begitu rata-rata jumlah tweet yang dihasilkan akun-akun bersentimen positif lebih banyak dibandingkan akun dengan sentimen negatif meskipun rata-rata usianya jauh lebih tua. Ini menunjukkan bahwa akun bersentimen positif lebih sering mengirim tweet dibandingkan akun bersentimen negatif.

show abstract

“…Interestingly, in Indonesia, even though human rights are mentioned in the second Pancasila principle, namely, "Just and civilized humanity," in reality, human rights are still not fully respected (Lestari, 2019). There are violations of human rights, such as the disbandment of demonstrations using violence (Aprilia, 2020:71-72) or the ensnaring of people who criticize the government using the Law Electronic Information and Transaction (Rahmawati et al, 2021). The cabinet misuses power by corrupting and bringing loss to public rights, such as the case of Covid-19 pandemic social aid corruption (Oktarina and Cayo, 2019:68-81) and also the case of the Bank of Indonesia Liquidity Aid.…”

Section: The Prophetic-transcendental-based Indonesian Legal Welfare Statementioning

confidence: 99%

Indonesia as a legal welfare state: A prophetic-transcendental basis

Dimyati

Nashir

Elviandri

et al. 2021

Heliyon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction The modern welfare state concept is based on individualistic and liberal social contracts that prioritize individual interests with liberalist, partial and non-holistic hegemonies. The welfare state concept has failed in directing citizens to achieve justice, peace, and welfare. The basic aim of the Republic of Indonesia's formation is to form a welfare country. But the Indonesian constitutional articles do not have the power to form a welfare society compared to those of other states, such as Norway, Japan, the USA, and Malaysia, whose constitutions aim to achieve welfare. Objective This research aims to explore the formulation of Indonesia as the Prophetic Transcendental-Based Legal Welfare State. The urgency of this research is on the effort of model invention, or a new postulate on the form of the Indonesian Legal Welfare State. Methods This is normative-juridical research with a philosophical approach to find and explore the formulation of Indonesia as the Prophetic Transcendental-Based Legal Welfare State. Conclusion This research found that as a Legal Welfare State, Indonesia inspirits Pancasila as the moral-spiritual guidance in all developmental policies on the national law, economy, politics, and culture. Thus, the direction of the state's development is inseparable from its roots, namely the prophetic and transcendental Pancasila. Novelty The previous researches discussed Indonesia as a welfare state only based on the determining legislation or laws. But this research discusses the philosophical aspect based on the thoughts of Indonesia's founding fathers.

show abstract

Kebebasan Berpendapat Terhadap Pemerintah Melalui Media Sosial Dalam Perspektif Uu Ite

Cited by 17 publications

References 0 publications

Criminalization Based on the Principle of Human Rights Limitation

Criminalization Based on the Principle of Human Rights Limitation

Analisis Karakteristik Akun Twitter Berdasarkan Sentimen Pendapat Terkait Undang-Undang PSE

Indonesia as a legal welfare state: A prophetic-transcendental basis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About