ABSTRAKPenelitian tentang disparitas pidana dalam putusan hakim terhadap tindak pidana psikotropika di Pengadilan Negeri Sleman ini menunjukkan bahwa di dalam praktik disparitas pidana dalam pengenaan sanksi pidana terhadap pelaku tindak pidana psikotropika memang terjadi. Penyebab terjadinya disparitas pidana terhadap tindak pidana psikotropika bersumber pada berbagai hal yakni: dari diri hakim, dari hukumnya sendiri, serta karakteristik kasus yang bersangkutan. Upaya meminimalisir disparitas pidana dapat dilakukan dengan mengefektifkan fungsi majelis hakim dengan menggunakan semua potensi yang ada pada diri hakim sendiri atau dapat dilakukan dengan mengadakan pelatihan yang diikuti oleh semua subsistem peradilan pidana agar memiliki persamaan visi dan misi terhadap peradilan pidana. Selain itu dapat digunakan suatu pendekatan dengan menciptakan pedoman pemberian pidana, meningkatkan peranan pengadilan banding, seleksi dan latihan para hakim, khususnya di Pengadilan Negeri untuk konsistensi kebijakan pemidanaan.
Pembuatan apotek hidup di lingkungan pemukiman padat perkotaan sudah jarang ditemui dan perlu untuk digalakkan kembali, saslah satunya di Kelurahan Tahunan, Umbulharjo, Yogyakarta. Hal ini didasarkan pada kebutuhan warga setempat dan masih adanya lahan kosong yang dapat dimanfaatkan. Pembuatan apotek hidup di lingkungan pemukiman padat Kelurahan Tahunan ini sebagai salah satu bentuk pemanfaatan lahan yang tersedia sebagai bentuk program aktivitas warga dan dapat memperbaiki tingkat ekonomi. Sebelum ke tahap pembuatan apotek hidup, kami juga sudah melakukan sosialisasi mengenai apotek hidup kepada warga. Metode pelaksanaan program KKN meliputi : pendidikan masyarakat, dan praktik langsung. Dampak dari kegiatan KKN ini adalah : 1) tercipta kesadaran masyarakat tentang pentingnya Apotek Hidup, 2) sosialisasi dan peningkatan pengetahuan masyarakat dalam mengolah lahan kosong untuk menjadi Apotek Hidup, 3) tahap pembuatan Apotek Hidup oleh mahasiswa bersama-sama dengan masyarakat, 4) lingkungan dapat menjadi lebih hijau, segar dan asri.
The pace of technological development can no longer be restrained until the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI), which later turns out to negatively impact its application. AI is a computer system program created by humans. On the one hand, the invention of AI makes human work easier. On the other hand, it is also noticeable that there are several criminal cases "performed" by AI. This research is qualitative research with doctrinal approach. The data used include secondary data consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The method of data collection is done through document study. The research concludes that the inventor of an invention of artificial intelligence can be charged with legal responsibility by applying the limits of liability both in civil and penal sanction. Further studies are needed to answer the question of how far this responsibility can be carried out.
Introduction toThe Problem: The use of criminal law to limit the freedom of citizens' civil rights must be done with caution since it intimately links to the infringement of such rights. Purpose/Objective Study: The present study aims to explore the criteria of criminalization based on the principle of limitations of human rights. Design/Methodology/Approach: This study employed doctrinal legal research using both conceptual and statutory approaches Findings: In the policy formation of illegal acts, the legislator frequently formulates rights constraints. The criminalization criteria specified in the human rights limitation can be used to apply this restriction. Restriction-containing offenses determined by the legislature must be by law, legitimate aim, and necessity in a democratic society. A consistent model of criteria for democratic society demands does not exist. This last criterion is linked to both the proportionality principle in human rights and the concept of criminal law as a last resort.
Introduction to The Problem: As part of the organization of the government duties and community services, the authority to make a decision is attributed to the government officials (inherent aan het bestuur), which has led many to become a suspect and a convict. On the other hand, it is believed that the government's policies are not subject to the law. This paper analyze abuse of authority according to a meaning deconstruction. Purpose/Objective Study: This study aims to determine to analyze abuse of authority according to a meaning deconstruction Design/Methodology/Approach: The research applied normative juridical approach as the logical consequence of sui generis of law. Findings: Each network of a structure of meaning is always presented in the form of binary opposition. One of the elements is marginalized and abandoned. Similarly, in the field of law, the term "abuse of authority," which is often connected to the damage that occurs to the state's financial condition, is seen as an absolute part of the Criminal Law. Arbitrarily, it replaces the function of the State Administrative Law. The "financial loss," which is then known as corruption, is the result of 'abuse of authority,' originated from the State Administrative Law. Through Jacques Derrida's perspective, a marginalized binary opposition is made into being. It is not to dominate others, but to share the views. The disjuncture between the state administrative law and criminal law has caused an unresolved issue of corruption. Through Paul Scholten's perspective, in essence, the criminal law has abandoned the social fact that there is a strong correlation between the deeds in the state administrative law and those in the criminal law, which is in the theoretical domain of administrative criminal law. The abandonment is against the hulprecht principle related to the implementation of the law mentioned above. The research employed a normative juridical method based on secondary data using philosophical, conceptual, and legal approaches. Originality: This article discusses specifically abuse of authority, a meaning deconstruction in terms of criminal law and state administrative law Paper Type: General Review
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.