2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.mee.2008.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High resolution electron beam lithography of PMGI using solvent developers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since there is no hard etching mask (Cr) on the ridge during the RIE of pillars, the ridges would shrink for order 10 nm depending on the etched depth. As both PMGI (using solvent developers) and ZEP-520A are high-resolution resists with high contrasts [8,9], smaller features could be fabricated using the current process.…”
Section: Process For Nanoimprint Mold Fabrication and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since there is no hard etching mask (Cr) on the ridge during the RIE of pillars, the ridges would shrink for order 10 nm depending on the etched depth. As both PMGI (using solvent developers) and ZEP-520A are high-resolution resists with high contrasts [8,9], smaller features could be fabricated using the current process.…”
Section: Process For Nanoimprint Mold Fabrication and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the dissolution rate by a base solution increases drastically when PMGI is exposed to electrons, it is effectively an EBL resist with sensitivity of 50–100 μC/cm 2 [6,7]. However, its sensitivity drops considerably to ~1,000 μC/cm 2 when using solvent developers such as methyl ethyl ketone (MEK) and methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK) [8], making it a suitable choice for the current bi-layer resist process. The rather low sensitivity of PMGI does not increase the e-beam writing time significantly because the exposure area of the pillars is much less than that of the trenches.…”
Section: Bi-layer Ebl Resistmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, it was discovered that PMGI has a contrast close to that of PMMA, yet approximately four times less sensitive, when developed with common PMMA developers. 9 However, we have shown that using a weak solvent, xylenes, which is a common developer for ZEP, the contrast of PMGI can be higher than 12. This high contrast enables the formation of narrow trenches in a thick layer of the resist; sub 20 nm features with aspect ratios of approximately 30:1 are readily achievable as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Similarly, ZEP resist has ARs limited to 4:1 at 20 keV [6] and to 7:1 at 100 keV [7], albeit with over three times higher sensitivity than PMMA. Another positive-tone resist, polymethylglutarimide (PMGI), has been patterned with an AR of over 2:1 at 30 keV [8] and extremely high AR of 38:1 at 100 keV [9] using an optimized development process. However, the sensitivity of PMGI is four to nine times lower than that of PMMA, requiring up to 18,000 μC/cm 2 [9] to expose a single line.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This represents a greater than two times improvement over benchmark PMMA resist; however, its sensitivity and resolution are lower than those of PMMA using supplier-recommended conditions. Similar to other positive-tone resists such as PMMA [18], PMGI [8], and ZEP [19], SML may be developed in methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK)/isopropyl alcohol (IPA) (1:3) solution and rinsed in IPA [20]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%