2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-99918-0_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Goal Programming Models for Managerial Strategic Decision Making

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the main causes of project failure can be seen in inappropriately selected and used project management methods, but also in the failure of human capital [17], e.g. closed formal communication between people [18], between members of the project team/stakeholders in the project, etc. sub-partners.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the main causes of project failure can be seen in inappropriately selected and used project management methods, but also in the failure of human capital [17], e.g. closed formal communication between people [18], between members of the project team/stakeholders in the project, etc. sub-partners.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GP model, a multi-objective programming (MOP) method, is the development of Linear Programming, a mathematical tool for managing multiple and different objectives. The model is suitable for any strategic decision making because it combines multiple objectives although there exists competing and opposing objectives (Colapinto, et al, 2020). Besides, GP model is also used in making decision making especially involve in optimizing profit and budgetary allocation (Dan et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above concerns corporate culture that plays an important role in making efficient managerial decisions of both strategic and tactical nature. The issues related to approaches towards managerial decision making processes are under ongoing scientific discussion (Plenkina et al 2018;Labanauskis et al 2018;Tvaronavičienė 2018;Tvaronavičienė et al 2018;Colapinto et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%