2010
DOI: 10.1109/tpc.2010.2046085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining the Role of the Communication Channel Interface and Recipient Characteristics on Knowledge Internalization: A Pragmatist View

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
15
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…These means include both the presence of qualified people to teach and the technological resources and mechanisms applicable to the transfer (SUN; SCOTT, 2005; SZULANSKI; RINGOV; JENSEN, 2016). For Scott and Sarker (2010), the successful transfer of knowledge requires not only that the receiver has internalized the new knowledge, but also that the company can apply it. Thus, the simple availability of expertise does not mean its effective transfer (DAVENPORT;PRUSAK, 2003).…”
Section: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These means include both the presence of qualified people to teach and the technological resources and mechanisms applicable to the transfer (SUN; SCOTT, 2005; SZULANSKI; RINGOV; JENSEN, 2016). For Scott and Sarker (2010), the successful transfer of knowledge requires not only that the receiver has internalized the new knowledge, but also that the company can apply it. Thus, the simple availability of expertise does not mean its effective transfer (DAVENPORT;PRUSAK, 2003).…”
Section: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, several authors point out that it is a challenge to measure this result (Easterby-Smith et al, 2008;Pérez-Nordtvedt et al, 2008;Sammarra & Biggiero, 2008;Van Wijk et al, 2008). Thus, in relation to the results of knowledge transfer, there are several studies in the literature that, in general, relegate the possession or the implementation of knowledge transfer as a measure of this process (Cummings, 2003;Pérez-Nordtvedt et al, 2008;Scott & Sarker, 2010). However, knowledge implemented is not always synonymous with internalized knowledge: "only the possession of knowledge does not guarantee a competitive advantage" (Mu et al, 2010, p. 31).…”
Section: Knowledge Internalization As An Outcome Measure Of the Knowlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Absorptive capacity (Cohen & Levinthal, 1990;Zahra & George, 2002), is presented as one of the most influential factors in knowledge transfer, often being associated with the success of knowledge transfer (Cohen & Levinthal, 1990;Scott & Sarker, 2010;Szulanski, 2000). Absorptive capacity is understood as the ability to recognize the value of external knowledge, and to assimilate, explore and use new knowledge (Cohen & Levinthal, 1990;Zahra & George, 2002).…”
Section: Absorptive Capacity and Knowledge Internalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using computer-based media, such as email, text messaging, and social networking to discuss a problem or task fraught with equivocality can lead to misinterpretations and confusion that might not otherwise exist in a face-to-face conversation. Computer-mediated communicators will thus attempt to expand the richness of the channel by attending to the relatively few relational cues that remain in the message, such as unique turns of phrase [22], symbols [23], response latencies [24], spelling errors [25], punctuation [26], and emoticons [27], among others, in an effort to effectively process the message.…”
Section: Selection Of Literature For Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%