2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence of Payments for Ecosystem Services as a mechanism for supporting biodiversity conservation and rural livelihoods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
66
0
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
66
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the last decades, PES programs aimed at improving ES and alleviating poverty are becoming important and thus are undergoing rapid development in both developed and developing countries [31][32][33]. China is now a global leader in PES development [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last decades, PES programs aimed at improving ES and alleviating poverty are becoming important and thus are undergoing rapid development in both developed and developing countries [31][32][33]. China is now a global leader in PES development [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ketidakjelasan narasi aturan dan inkonsistensi dimana lebih didominasi pemahaman ilmu kehutanan dan mengabaikan pengguna lain, khususnya masyarakat sekitar hutan atau interaksi sosial sering diabaikan (Kartodihardjo, 2013). Tidak adanya peran serta masyarakat dalam pengaturan pemanfaatan, mengakibatkan masyarakat terpisah dari interaksi sosialnya dalam pengelolaan hutan, khususnya dalam mencari kebutuhan kehidupannya sendiri (livelihoods) dengan membentuk akses terhadap kawasan hutan (Ingram et al, 2014).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…For example, payments for ecosystem services is a market-based alternative and has been suggested as a more effective strategy for offsetting landowner costs associated with ecosystem service production (Ingram et al 2014). Studies have identified non-industrial private forest landowners as receptive to payments for carbon sequestration Dwivedi et al 2009); but, we still know relatively little about forest landowner preferences for these policy approaches and their use has not been widely subscribed.…”
Section: Policy Options For Florida's Future Forestsmentioning
confidence: 99%