Efisiensi Produksi Sapi Potong Pada Peternakan Rakyat Pada Musim Kemarau Di Daerah Pertanian Lahan Kering Kabupaten Gunungkidul

Abstract

<p><em>This research was conducted to know the production efficiency of beef cattle in smallholder farmer in a dry farming area at dry season. Research has been started on June and finished on September (dry season) at smallholder farmer in the village Kemejing, Semin subdistrict, district Gunungkidul, DIY. The research materials are 28 heads of beef cattle from 17 farmers, which consist of 10 heads of PO breed, 10 heads of a Simpo breed, and 8 heads of Limpo breed with 292.25 kg of initial body weight. This research was using Participatory Rural Appraisal method which is a collecting data process that an active teamwork between data collector and farmer. Collected parameter are feed intake, average daily gain (ADG), feed efficiency, feed cost per gain (FC/G), and income over feed cost (IOFC). Data resulting from this research are 8.42 kg/head/day of feed intake, 0.19 kg/head/day of ADG, 0.021 of feed efficiency, Rp 46.166,62 of feed cost per gain, and Rp 3.985,55 of income over feed cost. It can be concluded that the efficient production of beef cattle in smallholder farmer at the dry area is low because average daily gain, feed cost per gain and income over feed cost produced are extremely small so if the calculated economic result is less favorable.</em></p>

Feed Intake and Feed Conversion Ratio of Ongole Crossbred Cattle Fattened at Different Ages and Feed

“…The % DM intake in the dryland agricultural areas of Gunungkidul Regency was ranging from 1.91 to. 5.19% with an average was 2.74% [14]. The results of this study were similar to those reported by Paramita et al [15] in 1.5 years old PO cattle, weighing 180-200 kg, the DM intake was 2.52-2.74%.…”

Studi performa Domba Sapudi pada berbagai umur di UPT Pembibitan Ternak dan Hijauan Makanan TernakJember - Jawa Timur

“…Feed cost per gain (fc/g) adalah besarnya biaya pakan yang diperlukan ternak untuk menghasilkan 1 kg gain (Handayanta, et al, 2017) Feed cost per gain ini dihitung berdasarkan pada harga pakan yang dikeluarkan setiap hari oleh UPT PT dan HMT Jember dibagi dengan rerata pertambahan bobot badan yang dihasilkan.…”

Jejak Lahan Sistem Pertanian Terpadu Tanaman-Ternak di Kabupaten Bojonegoro, Jawa Timur

“…Kajian integrasi tanaman-ternak pada level komunitas maupun kawasan di Indonesia, sudah banyak dilaporkan (Kariyasa, 2005;Diwyanto et al, 2007;Siswati dan Nizar, 2012;Handayanta et al, 2017;Sandi et al, 2018). Petani tertarik menerapkan sistem tersebut karena dapat mencegah erosi, mengurangi ketergantungan pupuk, dan meningkatkan manfaat lahan, produksi tanaman, populasi ternak, ketahanan pangan serta pendapatan (Mugnisjah et al, 2000;Kariyasa, 2005;Diwyanto et al, 2007;Salendu dan Elly, 2012;Yuliani, 2014;Carof dan Godinot, 2018;Harahap et al, 2019).…”

“…Persoalannya, sebagian ternak rakyat sering mengalami kekurangan pakan khususnya pada musim kemarau (Handayanta et al, 2017;Sandi et al, 2018) seperti pada Sekolah Peternakan Rakyat (SPR), sehingga keberlanjutan sistem menjadi terganggu. SPR adalah salah satu bentuk aksi komunitas yang bertujuan mendukung swasembada daging sapi (LPPM-IPB, 2015;Nuhung, 2015).…”

“…Fluktuasi tersebut sejalan dengan musim kemarau dan periode antar panen tanaman pangan. Menurut Handayanta et al (2017) peternak rakyat umumnya menghadapi kesulitan memperoleh pakan alami musim kemarau. Hal yang sama juga dihadapi oleh peternak di Desa Sekaran.…”