1980
DOI: 10.1016/0038-1101(80)90060-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of non-uniformly doped surface layer on the barrier height of a Schottky contact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…References (10) and (23) have also considered the effects associated with acceptor doping profiles with Gaussian, exponential, or complementary error function form. For a given quantity of ionized acceptor charge, the relative magnitude of the barrier enhancement A4~B decreases in the order planar > Gaussian > erfc > exponential.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…References (10) and (23) have also considered the effects associated with acceptor doping profiles with Gaussian, exponential, or complementary error function form. For a given quantity of ionized acceptor charge, the relative magnitude of the barrier enhancement A4~B decreases in the order planar > Gaussian > erfc > exponential.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretical background.--Modified barrier heights due to shallow surface doping have been examined theoretically in considerable detail (9,(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26) since the early 1970's. Various levels of approximation of carrier effects have been considered, including (i) the depletion approximation (9,(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25), (ii) a limited inversion approximation that accounted for minority free-carriers outside the p* region (26), and (iii) numerical calculations, including both electron and hole free-carriers throughout the device structure (present work).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effect is evidently not an intrinsic property of ideal Schottky barriers but an artefact. Various attemps have been made to explain such temperature dependence in termes of particular distribution of interface states and a non‐uniformly doped surface layers .The simplest form of barrier lowering is that due to image force. Following the image force model, the variation of barrier height Δϕ B is proportional to the reverse bias ( V R ) 1/4 , and consequently a plot of ln( I ) versus ( V R ) 1/4 should give a straight line.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Sehottky barriers on most covalent semiconductors are relatively insensitive to changes in the metal workfunction, it has been known since the early 1970's that surface-doped barriers in either a metal-p+-n (MPN) or metalm*-p (MNP) configuration can be employed to enhance barrier heights. A number of theoretical papers have appeared treating both narrow (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6) and extended (7)(8)(9) surface-doped regions. With the exception of Ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%