2015
DOI: 10.1111/his.12765
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differential expression of immunohistochemical markers in primary lung and breast cancers enriched for triple‐negative tumours

Abstract: An immunohistochemical panel incorporating ER, TTF-1, GCDFP-15, p63 and WT1 can help to distinguish lung cancer from metastatic breast cancer, including TNBC.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…NKX2-1 is a transcription factor that regulates thyroid-specific genes and genes involved in morphogenesis. NKX2-1 has previously been identified as a marker to distinguish breast cancer from other types of cancer 48 . DNASE1, CASP3 and PPT1 are involved in cell death by apoptosis [49][50][51] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NKX2-1 is a transcription factor that regulates thyroid-specific genes and genes involved in morphogenesis. NKX2-1 has previously been identified as a marker to distinguish breast cancer from other types of cancer 48 . DNASE1, CASP3 and PPT1 are involved in cell death by apoptosis [49][50][51] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 On the basis of the fact that the majority of breast cancers express ER and a low proportion of lung cancer specimens are positive for ER, it has been suggested that ER should be included in a differential diagnostic panel. 21 However, caution is warranted, as interpretation of ER positivity alone may lead to the false assumption of a pulmonary breast cancer metastasis, 2,18,31 specifically because of the high sensitivity of SP1, the ER clone used in this study. 32 Controversial observations have been made regarding survival, as some authors have reported a favourable outcome in patients with ER-positive tumours, 23,33,34 whereas others could not find a statistically significant difference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Staining characteristics for thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1), napsin-A, cytokeratin (CK) 5/6, and p40 Studies on NSCLC tissue specimens found ER positivity in 0-73%. [18][19][20][21][22][23] Some of this great variability may be explained by the use of different clones, 24 and the definition of positivity in tumours with cytoplasmic reactivity in some studies. 25 In primary breast cancer, ER positivity is currently defined as ≥1% positive tumour cell nuclei according to the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations, 26,27 based on the lack of benefit from hormonal therapy in patients with tumours with <1% positivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The frequency of ER expression in lung adenocarcinoma has been reported to vary from 7.6% to 27.2%, depending on the antibody used[48]. TTF-1 is positive in 73%–88% of lung adenocarcinoma cases, and there are very few reports of its positivity in breast cancer (less than 3% at least weakly or focally)[49]. Napsin A staining has been reported to be positive in 80%-90% of lung adenocarcinoma cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%