These guidelines are a consensus work of a considerable number of members of the immunology and flow cytometry community. They provide the theory and key practical aspects of flow cytometry enabling immunologists to avoid the common errors that often undermine immunological data. Notably, there are comprehensive sections of all major immune cell types with helpful Tables detailing phenotypes in murine and human cells. The latest flow cytometry techniques and applications are also described, featuring examples of the data that can be generated and, importantly, how the data can be analysed. Furthermore, there are sections detailing tips, tricks and pitfalls to avoid, all written and peer‐reviewed by leading experts in the field, making this an essential research companion.

Purpose To facilitate the transition of MALDI–MS Imaging (MALDI–MSI) from basic science to clinical application, it is necessary to analyze formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded (FFPE) tissues. The aim is to improve in situ tryptic digestion for MALDI–MSI of FFPE samples and determine if similar results would be reproducible if obtained from different sites. Experimental Design FFPE tissues (mouse intestine, human ovarian teratoma, tissue microarray of tumor entities sampled from three different sites) are prepared for MALDI–MSI. Samples are coated with trypsin using an automated sprayer then incubated using deliquescence to maintain a stable humid environment. After digestion, samples are sprayed with CHCA using the same spraying device and analyzed with a rapifleX MALDI Tissuetyper at 50 µm spatial resolution. Data are analyzed using flexImaging, SCiLS, and R. Results Trypsin application and digestion are identified as sources of variation and loss of spatial resolution in the MALDI–MSI of FFPE samples. Using the described workflow, it is possible to discriminate discrete histological features in different tissues and enabled different sites to generate images of similar quality when assessed by spatial segmentation and PCA. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance Spatial resolution and site‐to‐site reproducibility can be maintained by adhering to a standardized MALDI–MSI workflow.

The third edition of Flow Cytometry Guidelines provides the key aspects to consider when performing flow cytometry experiments and includes comprehensive sections describing phenotypes and functional assays of all major human and murine immune cell subsets. Notably, the Guidelines contain helpful tables highlighting phenotypes and key differences between human and murine cells. Another useful feature of this edition is the flow cytometry analysis of clinical samples with examples of flow cytometry applications in the context of autoimmune diseases, cancers as well as acute and chronic infectious diseases. Furthermore, there are sections detailing tips, tricks and pitfalls to avoid. All sections are written and peer-reviewed by leading flow cytometry experts and immunologists, making this edition an essential and state-of-the-art handbook for basic and clinical researchers.

Introduction: In-depth genomic characterization of thymic epithelial tumors (TETs), comprising thymomas and thymic carcinomas (TCs), failed to identify targetable mutations and suggested unique biology of TETs, including KIT expression in most TCs. Recently, tuft cell-like medullary thymic epithelial cells were identified in the murine thymus, and our reanalysis of the published gene expression data revealed that these cells express KIT. In addition, recently, a minor subset of SCLCs with tuft cell-like features was described.Methods: We interrogated mRNA expression data from our tumor cohorts (N ¼ 60) and publicly available, independent data sets from TETs and NSCLC (N ¼ 1199) for expression of tuft cell genes and KIT. Expression of KIT and of POU2F3 protein, the master regulator of tuft cells, was analyzed in cancer tissue (N ¼ 344) by immunohistochemistry.Results: Normal human thymic tuft cells and most TCs coexpressed KIT and known tuft cell genes, particularly POU2F3 and GFI1B. Unexpectedly, small subsets of tuft celllike tumors coexpressing POU2F3, GFI1B, and KIT were

Reliable entity subtyping is paramount for therapy stratification in lung cancer. Morphological evaluation remains the basis for entity subtyping and directs the application of additional methods such as immunohistochemistry (IHC). The decision of whether to perform IHC for subtyping is subjective, and access to IHC is not available worldwide. Thus, the application of additional methods to support morphological entity subtyping is desirable. Therefore, the ability of convolutional neuronal networks (CNNs) to classify the most common lung cancer subtypes, pulmonary adenocarcinoma (ADC), pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC), and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), was evaluated. A cohort of 80 ADC, 80 SqCC, 80 SCLC, and 30 skeletal muscle specimens was assembled; slides were scanned; tumor areas were annotated; image patches were extracted; and cases were randomly assigned to a training, validation or test set. Multiple CNN architectures (VGG16, InceptionV3, and InceptionResNetV2) were trained and optimized to classify the four entities. A quality control (QC) metric was established. An optimized InceptionV3 CNN architecture yielded the highest classification accuracy and was used for the classification of the test set. Image patch and patient-based CNN classification results were 95% and 100% in the test set after the application of strict QC. Misclassified cases mainly included ADC and SqCC. The QC metric identified cases that needed further IHC for definite entity subtyping. The study highlights the potential and limitations of CNN image classification models for tumor differentiation.

Highlights d BA synergizes with RT to overcome tumor immune evasion via TME reprogramming d Reconstitution of tumor immunosurveillance by BART induces abscopal effects d In fibrotic lungs, PD-L1 + endothelial cells and M2-like lipofibroblasts express TGF-b d BA attenuates lung fibrosis by neutralizing TGF-b in the relevant PD-L1 + compartments

No abstract

Objective: Recognition of neuroendocrine differentiation is important for tumor classification and treatment stratification. To detect and confirm neuroendocrine differentiation, a combination of morphology and immunohistochemistry is often required. In this regard, synaptophysin, chromogranin A, and CD56 are established immunohistochemical markers. Insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) has been suggested as a novel stand-alone marker with the potential to replace the current standard panel. In this study, we compared the sensitivity and specificity of INSM1 and established markers. Materials and Methods: A cohort of 493 lung tumors including 112 typical, 39 atypical carcinoids, 77 large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas, 144 small cell lung cancers, 30 thoracic paragangliomas, 47 adenocarcinomas, and 44 squamous cell carcinomas were selected and tissue microarrays were constructed. Synaptophysin, chromogranin A, CD56, and INSM1 were stained on all cases and evaluated manually as well as with an analysis software. Positivity was defined as ≥1% stained tumor cells in at least 1 of 2 cores per patient. Results: INSM1 was positive in 305 of 402 tumors with expected neuroendocrine differentiation (typical and atypical carcinoids, large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas, small cell lung cancers, and paraganglioma; sensitivity: 76%). INSM1 was negative in all but 1 of 91 analyzed non-neuroendocrine tumors (adenocarcinomas, squamous cell carcinomas; specificity: 99%). All conventional markers, as well as their combination, had a higher sensitivity (97%) and a lower specificity (78%) for neuroendocrine differentiation compared with INSM1. Conclusions: Although INSM1 might be a meaningful adjunct in the differential diagnosis of neuroendocrine neoplasias, a general uncritical vote for replacing the traditional markers by INSM1 may not be justified.