2019
DOI: 10.29333/iji.2019.12313a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing an Instrument to Detect Science Misconception of an Elementary School Teacher

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
12
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Schools were randomly selected and taken from 2 regions representing the Province of West Nusa Tenggara, namely Lombok and Sumbawa islands. The pre-analysis of EFA used Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin and Bartlett's Test of Sphericity scores (Hair et al, 2010;Chan, L. L., & Idris, 2017;Surastina, 2018), while the EFA acceptance criteria used a loading factor value > 0.3 (Desstya et al, 2019) and Eigenvalue >1 (Yong, A. G., & Pearce, 2013). The fit criteria for the EFA were tested through the CFA using the Goodness of fit index (GFI), Root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI), and Comparative Fit 616 Instruction, October 2022 • Vol.15, No.4 Index (CFI) criteria (Sun, 2005;Zainudin et al, 2019;Tomé-Fernández et al, 2020;Tungkunanan, 2020;Siewseng et al, 2020).…”
Section: Methods Instrument Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Schools were randomly selected and taken from 2 regions representing the Province of West Nusa Tenggara, namely Lombok and Sumbawa islands. The pre-analysis of EFA used Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin and Bartlett's Test of Sphericity scores (Hair et al, 2010;Chan, L. L., & Idris, 2017;Surastina, 2018), while the EFA acceptance criteria used a loading factor value > 0.3 (Desstya et al, 2019) and Eigenvalue >1 (Yong, A. G., & Pearce, 2013). The fit criteria for the EFA were tested through the CFA using the Goodness of fit index (GFI), Root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI), and Comparative Fit 616 Instruction, October 2022 • Vol.15, No.4 Index (CFI) criteria (Sun, 2005;Zainudin et al, 2019;Tomé-Fernández et al, 2020;Tungkunanan, 2020;Siewseng et al, 2020).…”
Section: Methods Instrument Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The p-value of the BTS test in Table 1 shows <0.001; this is evidence that there is a relationship between variables in the EFA so that it can be continued to the next stage of analysis (Field, 2000). After the two assumptions were met, then factor analysis was carried out on 25 items to determine the number of constructs formed using the parallel analysis method (Çokluk & Koçak, 2016), varimax rotation (Osborne, 2015), maximum likelihood estimation, and factor loading minimum value of 0.3 (Desstya et al, 2019). The numbers of factors formed, the value of each item's factor loading, variance, Cronbach's alpha, and between and inter-factor correlations are shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Exploratory Factor Analysis (Efa)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formula for the content validity test of the instruments used in usage trials and assessing the implementation of the Alkin-WP-based digital library evaluation software is the Gregory formula. The complete Gregory formula can be seen in Equation 1 [19][20][21].…”
Section: -Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selain itu, faktor lain yang boleh menjadi penyebab berlakunya miskonsepsi adalah disebabkan oleh guru (Bayuni et al, 2018;Desstya et al, 2019;Halim et al, 2019;Kiray et al, 2015). Guru memainkan peranan yang penting dalam menyampaikan maklumat atau ilmu tentang konsep saintifik.…”
Section: Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Miskonsepsiunclassified