2021
DOI: 10.28991/esj-2021-01308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utilization of Alkin-WP-Based Digital Library Evaluation Software as Evaluation Tool of Digital Library Effectiveness

Abstract: One source of learning in universities is a digital library. In the era of industry 4.0, most universities have implemented digital libraries in supporting the learning process. However, the reality shows that digital library management is still ineffective. Therefore, the implementation of digital libraries needs to be evaluated for determining the digital library effectiveness used as learning resources in supporting the learning process in universities. Many evaluation tools are used to evaluate the effecti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…En cualquier caso, se produjeron mejoras destacables entre ambas fases, pasando la valoración global de 3,72 a 3,84, y, especialmente, la desviación estándar, de 0,65 a 0,32). Si tenemos en consideración otras experiencias de evaluación de aplicaciones educativas, tras procesos de creacion e implementación, podemos señalar la Alkin-WP-based, desarrollada por Divayana et al (2021) y la BAYSICS (Batsaikhan & Hachinger, 2023). En ambos casos, se llevó a cabo un proceso de evaluación semejante, que dio como resultado herramientas optimizadas, útiles y de fácil uso.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…En cualquier caso, se produjeron mejoras destacables entre ambas fases, pasando la valoración global de 3,72 a 3,84, y, especialmente, la desviación estándar, de 0,65 a 0,32). Si tenemos en consideración otras experiencias de evaluación de aplicaciones educativas, tras procesos de creacion e implementación, podemos señalar la Alkin-WP-based, desarrollada por Divayana et al (2021) y la BAYSICS (Batsaikhan & Hachinger, 2023). En ambos casos, se llevó a cabo un proceso de evaluación semejante, que dio como resultado herramientas optimizadas, útiles y de fácil uso.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…In the MWMF method, the values of 𝑗 = n, n+1, n+2……, m+2n, while m is the amount of data. Considering that the total weight needs to meet the requirements of ∑ 𝑊 𝑗 = 1, determining the weight value of the Z-Score is carried out as follows ∑ 𝑊 𝑗+𝑖 𝑛 𝑖=−𝑛 [37].…”
Section:  Smoothing Stagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Weighted Product method consists of three calculation steps, including (1) improving the weight of the criteria, (2) determining the S-vector, and (3) determining the V-vector. The formula used to improve the weight of the criteria can be seen in Equation 1 [21,22], the formula for determining the S-vector can be seen in Equation 2 [23,24], and the formula for determining the V-vector can be seen in Equation 3 [25,26].…”
Section:  Simulation Search For Priority Aspects That Determine the ...mentioning
confidence: 99%