POWERCON '98. 1998 International Conference on Power System Technology. Proceedings (Cat. No.98EX151)
DOI: 10.1109/icpst.1998.728996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of locations for FACTS and energy storage by the singular analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [11] a Mixed Integer Linear programming (MILP) find optimal position of thyristor controlled phase shifter transformer (TCPST). Authors of [12] and [13] use methods which determine the weak places in the system using eigenvalue analysis of the system admitance matrix. They suggest these places as optimal location of shunt FACTS devices for reactive power and voltage regulation, respectively.…”
Section: B Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [11] a Mixed Integer Linear programming (MILP) find optimal position of thyristor controlled phase shifter transformer (TCPST). Authors of [12] and [13] use methods which determine the weak places in the system using eigenvalue analysis of the system admitance matrix. They suggest these places as optimal location of shunt FACTS devices for reactive power and voltage regulation, respectively.…”
Section: B Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23]- [33] Contrasting with the previous heuristic approaches, analytical methods are preferred by some authors to allocate FACTS devices in order to suit a given system need. For example, in [23] and [24], analyses of the power system Jacobian matrix singularity were used. Also, in [25]- [27] the authors used the line flow index (LFI) as their allocation criterion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among those used specifically in FACTS placement studies, the most popular are: genetic algorithm (GA) [4]- [9], tabu search (TA) [10], [11], simulated annealing (SA) [11], particle swarm optimization (PSO) [12]- [14], evolutionary algorithm (EA) [15]- [18], bacterial swarming algorithm (BSA) [19], group search optimizer with multiple producer (GSOMP) [20], harmony search algorithm (HSA) [21], and bees algorithm (BA) [22]. [23]- [33] Contrasting with the previous heuristic approaches, analytical methods are preferred by some authors to allocate FACTS devices in order to suit a given system need. For example, in [23] and [24], analyses of the power system Jacobian matrix singularity were used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has motivated the development of several kinds of approaches for finding proper locations of FACTS controllers in order to improve the power system's static or dynamic performance. Methodologies based on singular value decomposition [3], bus participation factor [4], augmented Lagrange multipliers [5], heuristic methods [6,7], mixed integer linear programming [8] and a sensitivitybased approach [9,10] have been proposed to allocate controllers to satisfy suitable steady-state control objectives. On the other hand, proper locations to improve damping of low-frequency electromechanical oscillations have been determined based on modal analysis [11][12][13] and residue method [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%