2016
DOI: 10.1590/0034-737x201663060003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deposição da calda na cultura da soja em função de diferentes pressões de trabalho e pontas de pulverização

Abstract: Deposição da calda na cultura da soja em função de diferentes pressões de trabalho e pontas de pulverização 1 A pressão de trabalho influencia as características da pulverização hidráulica de produtos fitossanitários e pode alterar a penetração da calda no dossel da cultura da soja. Este trabalho teve como objetivo avaliar o efeito da pressão na deposição de calda em plantas de soja, promovida por diferentes modelos de pontas de pulverização. O experimento foi conduzido em delineamento de blocos ao acaso, em e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it can be observed that with an increase in the application volume there was a tendency to increase deposition on the upper part of the plants, while it did not necessarily improve the deposition on the middle and lower thirds, where the smaller deposits occurred. The highest retention of the spray mix in the upper sector of the plants, in relation to the middle and/or lower third was verified in other studies on cotton (Scramin et al, 2002;Sousa et al, 2007a;Cavalieri et al, 2015) and with soybean crops (Derkensen et al, 2008;Constantin et al, 2012;Cunha et al, 2016). The deposit averages in the upper third were risen significantly with the increased volume applied up to 140 L ha -1 .…”
Section: Effect Of Spraying Volume On Deposition On Cotton Leavessupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Thus, it can be observed that with an increase in the application volume there was a tendency to increase deposition on the upper part of the plants, while it did not necessarily improve the deposition on the middle and lower thirds, where the smaller deposits occurred. The highest retention of the spray mix in the upper sector of the plants, in relation to the middle and/or lower third was verified in other studies on cotton (Scramin et al, 2002;Sousa et al, 2007a;Cavalieri et al, 2015) and with soybean crops (Derkensen et al, 2008;Constantin et al, 2012;Cunha et al, 2016). The deposit averages in the upper third were risen significantly with the increased volume applied up to 140 L ha -1 .…”
Section: Effect Of Spraying Volume On Deposition On Cotton Leavessupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Therefore, the droplet size produced by this equipment in the present study indicate a greater efficiency in depositing the spray mixture on the target. Corroborating this result, Cunha, Marques, & Alves, 2016, demonstrated that the spray tip that generated smaller and more uniform droplets was able to deposit more spray mixture throughout the canopy of soybean plants.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Reduction of row spacing increased grain yield by approximately 6.5% and 8.6% for the susceptible cultivar (SYN 1363 RR) and for the resistant cultivar (SYN 1365 RR), respectively, by observing the 0.17 m spacing between rows in relation to the other ones (Table 8 and Table 9). One of the main reasons for ineffective ASR control is associated with the target coverage deficiency by the application of fungicides, especially at the lower portion of the plant (Cunha et al, 2014;Silva et al, 2014;Cunha et al, 2016;Moura et al, 2017, Weber et al, 2017. The control efficacy becomes, therefore, compromised, as fungicides for ASR management, although systemic, are translocated to small distances from the deposition point (Reis et al, 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contrasting and variable effects on the Vortex ® system may be associated with the different canopy opening levels, which can be influenced by the plant arrangement (Holtz et al, 2014), depending on the characteristic of the cultivar Tormen et al, 2012), as well as by the time of the day of spraying, due to the variation of the horizontal angle of soybean leaves throughout the day (Graziano et al, 2017;Moura et al, 2017). Moreover, the spray tip angle, droplet size and speed, adjuvants and mixture volume are factors that also influence droplets' penetration along the canopy of the plant (Cunha et al, 2014, Madureira et al, 2015Prado et al, 2015;Cunha et al, 2016;Weber et al, 2017, França et al, 2018.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation