2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2020.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical analysis of methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of antibiotics in third molar surgeries using AMSTAR 2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the objectives is to analyze whether these systematic reviews had an optimal design and execution process. For this, the AMSTAR tool was developed, which was introduced for the first time in 2007 [ 32 , 46 , 47 ]. To increase the applicability of the AMSTAR tool, a group of experts made reviews and created the AMSTAR-2 tool [ 32 , 47 ], which was used in the present review.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the objectives is to analyze whether these systematic reviews had an optimal design and execution process. For this, the AMSTAR tool was developed, which was introduced for the first time in 2007 [ 32 , 46 , 47 ]. To increase the applicability of the AMSTAR tool, a group of experts made reviews and created the AMSTAR-2 tool [ 32 , 47 ], which was used in the present review.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AMSTAR 2 tool consists of 16 domains where seven are considered critical for the reliability of SRs findings (i.e., domains 2, 4, 7, 9, 11, 13, and 15), ranking the SR in high, moderate, low, and critically low [ 46 , 47 ]. For each domain, the answers will vary in “yes” (the domain criteria have been fulfilled), “partially yes” (the domain criteria have been partially fulfilled), and “no” (the domain criteria have not been fulfilled).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trata-se de um protocolo registrado com método pré-definido e declarado, disposto pelo item dois. Já foi previamente identificado na literatura como o registro de um protocolo está associado com alta qualidade pelo AMSTAR 67 . Este item pode ser considerado um passo simples na construção de uma revisão sistemática, porém só foi preenchido por três revisões sistemáticas: Bartels et al (2016), Fransen et al (2015), Regnaux et al (2015).…”
Section: ) Análise De Dadosunclassified