1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0040-6090(98)01168-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of orientation from random to (220) or (400) in polycrystalline silicon films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…40 This model agrees with the Raman results, which suggested that new nuclei were formed at/near the growth surface during film growth. In addition, unlike the case of preferentially oriented poly-Si, where lateral grain growth is enhanced by the driving force to decrease orientation fluctuation, 12 randomly oriented grains do not have a driving force for lateral grain growth after each grain is in contact with neighboring grains. Thus the grain size is determined by the nucleus density in the randomly oriented c-Si:H case.…”
Section: Growth Mechanism Of C-si:h and Relationship Between Film mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…40 This model agrees with the Raman results, which suggested that new nuclei were formed at/near the growth surface during film growth. In addition, unlike the case of preferentially oriented poly-Si, where lateral grain growth is enhanced by the driving force to decrease orientation fluctuation, 12 randomly oriented grains do not have a driving force for lateral grain growth after each grain is in contact with neighboring grains. Thus the grain size is determined by the nucleus density in the randomly oriented c-Si:H case.…”
Section: Growth Mechanism Of C-si:h and Relationship Between Film mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…As Nakahata et al report, Hall mobility has a good correlation with the lateral grain size measured by SEM and the lateral growth in preferentially oriented poly-Si occurs together with a decrease in orientation fluctuation. 12,22 Their results imply that the chemical bonding structure at the growth surface affects the structure of the subsequently grown film. In contrast, it is thought that the growth of the randomly oriented c-Si:H is not affected by the growth surface structure under the deposition condition used because the perpendicular grain size of the c-Si:H measured by XRD (D 220 ) is much smaller than the film thickness and also smaller than those measured in the ͑220͒ or ͑400͒ preferentially oriented poly-Si.…”
Section: Growth Mechanism Of C-si:h and Relationship Between Film mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The preferential growth can be affected by many factors, such as surface energy of crystal plane, the synthesis parameters or lattice mismatch between film materials and substrates [3]. Many attempts have been conducted to obtain preferred orientation of crystallization, such as electric field, metal-induced effect, stress and selective etching [4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, it was shown that changes in the preferential orientation of grains of highly crystallized µc-Si:F:H deposited from SiF 4 +H 2 +Ar were followed by significant changes in oxygen content [13]. However, in both cases changes in structure lead to the significant changes in ellipsometric spectra [12,14]. By contrast, we did not observe differences either between SE spectra, or IR and Raman spectra of µc-Si:H and µc-Si:F:H films deposited at the same conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%