2017
DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Shear Bond Strengths of Conventional Resin Cement and Self-adhesive Resin Cement bonded to Lithium Disilicate: An in vitro Study

Abstract: Aim:The aim of this study is to compare the shear bond strengths of conventional resin cement and self-adhesive resin cement bonded to lithium disilicate. Materials and methods:A total of 40 extracted human molar teeth were mounted in self-cure acrylic resin. Teeth were prepared to obtain flat occlusal surface. About 40 lithium disilicate specimens of dimension-10 mm in diameter and thickness of 2 mm-were fabricated using lost wax technique. The samples were divided into four groups: Groups I, II, III, and IV … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…substrates, a wide range of esthetic shades, favorable mechanical properties, a high strength, an excellent retention property, and poor solubility in oral environments (9,10) turn resin cements into the first option in the cementation of indirect restorations. According to the clinical steps required to prepare the substrate prior to cementation, the resin cements were categorized in three sub-groups, including etch-and-rinse, self-etch, and self-adhesive luting agents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…substrates, a wide range of esthetic shades, favorable mechanical properties, a high strength, an excellent retention property, and poor solubility in oral environments (9,10) turn resin cements into the first option in the cementation of indirect restorations. According to the clinical steps required to prepare the substrate prior to cementation, the resin cements were categorized in three sub-groups, including etch-and-rinse, self-etch, and self-adhesive luting agents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to the phenomenon of polymerization shrinkage, which can cause rupture of the adhesive interface, causing marginal microleakage and, consequently, a failure in material adhesion [16]. An efficient polymerization technique favors better expression of the properties of surface hardness, compressive strength and adhesive capacity; minimizing unwanted effects such as polymerization shrinkage, presence of residual monomer and temperature increase [27,28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 10 ] Moreover, they act as a permeable membrane after polymerization resulting in mechanical disruption of the coupling between the adhesive and composite resin that can be minimized by selecting a conventional 3-step and 2-step resin cement system. [ 12 ] Many studies have compared shear bond strength (SBS) of total-etch resin cements with self-etch resin cements or self-adhesive resin cements[ 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ] but few studies compared all the three resin cement systems. However, scarce information is available with regard to the bond strength directly between dentin and indirect substrates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%