The Micro-Shear bond strength of different cements to commercially pure titanium

Nakhaei, Mohammadreza; Fendereski, Zeinab; Alavi, S H; Mohammadipour, Hamideh-Sadat

doi:10.4317/jced.56022

Cited by 5 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…According to the results of the present study, adhesive fracture was the predominant failure mode with respect to the fact that resin cement monomers contain many carbon-carbon double bond units, which produce a high degree of matrix cross-linking and, consequently, high mechanical properties [ 14 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The results of a study conducted by Nakhaei et al [ 14 ], which examined the SBS of different cements to cp-Ti, demonstrated Panavia F.2 as the best choice for bonding to cp-Ti. In another study, Nakhaei et al [ 26 ] investigated the SBS of different bonding protocols to commercially pure titanium (cp-Ti) through the use of two universal adhesives, including Scotchbond Universal (SU; 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) and G-Premio Bond (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) and Alloy Primer (AP; Kuraray).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the following, the specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 24 h, and then the Tygon tubes were carefully removed with a scalpel blade. Lastly, the specimens were placed in a thermal cycling machine for 5000 rounds of thermal cycling at 5 °C and 55 °C with a dwell time of 15 s. The 5000 cycles of thermal cycling were equivalent to approximately six months of clinical service [ 13 , 14 ].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The Evaluation of Microshear Bond Strength of Resin Cements to Titanium Using Different Surface Treatment Methods: An In Vitro Study

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study attempted to investigate the effect of sandblasting and H2O2 treatments on the microshear bond strength of two commercially available resin cements. A total of 90 cube-shaped specimens of commercially pure titanium (cp-Ti) were divided into two groups of Panavia and MHA cements (n = 45). Samples of the Panavia group were randomly divided into three subgroups of 15 samples, including subgroups (no treatment, aluminum oxide sandblasting, and immersion in 35% hydrogen peroxide solution with halogen light). Once the treatment was completed, Panavia V5 was applied on the cp-Ti surface by a Tygon tube. The 45 specimens of the MHA cement group were randomly divided into three subgroups (n = 15) similarly to the Panavia group. Then, the MHA was applied on the surface of cp-Ti. A universal testing machine was used to measure and examine the microshear bond strength of cement to cp-Ti subsequent to the step of thermocycling. According to results, in the Panavia cement group, the SBS of sandblasting treatment was significantly higher than that of the H2O2 treatment subgroup (p < 0.05), which displayed a significantly higher SBS than that of the no-treatment subgroup (p < 0.001). In regard to the MHA group, the SBS of the H2O2 treatment subgroup was significantly lower than that of the sandblasting treatment subgroup (p < 0.001), whereas there were no significant differences between the SBS of the no treatment and H2O2 treatment subgroups (p = 0.35). Considering the comparison between Panavia and MHA cases, there were no significant differences observed among the no-treatment subgroups (p = 0.34), as well as the sandblasting treatment subgroups (p = 0.67), while the SBS of the H2O2 treatment subgroup in Panavia cement was higher than that of the H2O2 subgroup in MHA cement (p < 0.001). In conclusion, in both Panavia V5 and MHA cements, sandblasting treatment could improve the bond strength between the titanium surface. However, H2O2 treatment proved to be capable of enhancing the bond strength of Panavia V5 cement without causing any positive effects on the bond strength of MHA cement.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Evaluation of Microshear Bond Strength of Resin Cements to Titanium Using Different Surface Treatment Methods: An In Vitro Study

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…27 Various studies evaluating the bond strength of resin-based luting agents to titanium are available in the literature. 16 20 29 30 31 32 33 However, different results emerged even in the studies using similar luting agent types. These differences could be due to the primers used, specimen differences in study design, or compositional differences in luting agents, including different ratios of monomers and chemical/light catalysts.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of surface treatment and luting agent type on shear bond strength of titanium to ceramic materials

Karaokutan

Özel

2022

J Adv Prosthodont

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PURPOSE This study aimed to compare the effect of different surface treatments and luting agent types on the shear bond strength of two ceramics to commercially pure titanium (Cp Ti). MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 160 Cp Ti specimens were divided into 4 subgroups (n = 40) according to surface treatments received (control, 50 µm airborne-particle abrasion, 110 µm airborne-particle abrasion, and tribochemical coating). The cementation surfaces of titanium and all-ceramic specimens were treated with a universal primer. Two cubic all-ceramic discs (lithium disilicate ceramic (LDC) and zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic (ZLC)) were cemented to titanium using two types of resin-based luting agents: self-cure and dual-cure (n = 10). After cementation, all specimens were subjected to 5000 cycles of thermal aging. A shear bond strength (SBS) test was conducted, and the failure mode was determined using a scanning electron microscope. Data were analyzed using three-way ANOVA, and the Tukey-HSD test was used for post hoc comparisons ( P < .05). RESULTS Significant differences were found among the groups based on surface treatment, resin-based luting agent, and ceramic type ( P < .05). Among the surface treatments, 50 µm air-abrasion showed the highest SBS, while the control group showed the lowest. SBS was higher for dual-cure resin-based luting agent than self-cure luting agent. ZLC showed better SBS values than LDC. CONCLUSION The cementation of ZLC with dual-cure resin-based luting agent showed better bonding effectiveness to commercially pure titanium treated with 50 µm airborne-particle abrasion.

show abstract

“…Therefore, alloy surfaces should be decontaminated with ultrasonic cleansing [ 52 ]. However, Al 2 O 3 remained embedded on the titanium surfaces, and these encrusted particles establish chemical affinity between functional monomers of resin materials and themselves, increasing the resin cement's binding strength [ 53 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Shear Bond Strength of Lithium Disilicate Bonded with Various Surface-Treated Titanium

Amornwichitwech

Palanuwech

2022

International Journal of Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose. Retention is one of the most important factors for fixed dental prostheses, especially in implant dentistry. Accordingly, the goal of this study was to evaluate the level of shear bond strength between titanium (Ti) subjected to different surface treatments and lithium disilicate glass-ceramics. Materials and Methods. In this work, 90 titanium alloy specimens were divided into six groups as follows: the control group (CT), 50 μm alumina airborne-particle abrasion group (SB), silica-coated group (CJ), anodization group (AN), anodization followed by alumina 50 μm airborne-particle abrasion group (ANSB), and anodization followed by silica coating group (ANCJ). Titanium specimens were bonded to lithium disilicate specimens with resin cement (Multilink N). The specimens were restored in water at 37°C for 24 h, and then, shear bond strength (SBS) tests were performed using a universal testing machine (Shimadzu, Japan). The SBS values were statistically analyzed. The failure mode of the debonded titanium was classified after viewing the samples under a stereoscope. Results. The results demonstrated that the mean SBSs of CT and AN were significantly lower than those of the other groups ( p < 0.05 ). The SB group showed the highest SBS (29.47 ± 2.41 MPa); however, there was no significant difference between SB, ANSB, ANCJ, and CJ. The stereoscopic analysis demonstrated that the failure mode of AN was predominantly adhesive failure; whereas, the other groups showed cohesive and mixed failures. Conclusions. In this study, it was found that the surface treatment with 50 μm alumina airborne-particle abrasion, silica coating with Cojet™ sand, anodization followed by 50 μm alumina airborne-particle abrasion, and anodization followed by silica coating with Cojet™ sand improved the SBS between titanium and lithium disilicate luted with Multilink N resin cement.

show abstract

The Micro-Shear bond strength of different cements to commercially pure titanium

Cited by 5 publications

References 30 publications

The Evaluation of Microshear Bond Strength of Resin Cements to Titanium Using Different Surface Treatment Methods: An In Vitro Study

The Evaluation of Microshear Bond Strength of Resin Cements to Titanium Using Different Surface Treatment Methods: An In Vitro Study

Effect of surface treatment and luting agent type on shear bond strength of titanium to ceramic materials

Shear Bond Strength of Lithium Disilicate Bonded with Various Surface-Treated Titanium

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About