2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.sse.2014.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compact core model for Symmetric Double-Gate Junctionless Transistors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many models were proposed, and the difference among them depends on the approximations that are involved in the derivation and the considered effects. For instance, many models do not consider short channel and quantum effects [53,55,58,66], while others are only valid for certain doping concentrations and device layer thickness ranges [59,61]. Quantum effects are critically important, because they can affect the threshold voltage [74].…”
Section: Double Gatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many models were proposed, and the difference among them depends on the approximations that are involved in the derivation and the considered effects. For instance, many models do not consider short channel and quantum effects [53,55,58,66], while others are only valid for certain doping concentrations and device layer thickness ranges [59,61]. Quantum effects are critically important, because they can affect the threshold voltage [74].…”
Section: Double Gatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are numerous compact drain current models reported for JL transistors for long-channel [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] and short channel devices [11][12][13][14][15][16], the literature reveals only a handful of intrinsic capacitance models. For double-gate junctionless transistors, a charge based analytical model for long-channel devices has been developed in [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, by reducing the contacts' separating region, it is possible to get higher ON-OFF switching performance. Despite that several experimental and numerical studies published recently have shown the superior fabrication process properties provided by the junctionless device in comparison with the conventional one [4][5][6], the junctionless structure is more vulnerable to the impact of the source/drain parasitic resistance compared to an inversion mode structure [7,8]. The high series resistance associated to the source and drain regions can arise as a serious problem when dealing with uniformly doped channel, which leads to the degradation of the device performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%