2011 18th IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits, and Systems 2011
DOI: 10.1109/icecs.2011.6122252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Code-independent output impedance: A new approach to increasing the linearity of current-steering DACs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For high-speed DACs, the current source mismatches [1], [2], [8]- [10], code-dependent load variations [3]- [5], [11] and code-dependent switching glitches [2]- [4], [7] are the main issues that limit the SFDR. At higher frequencies, the finite output impedance due to parasitics worsens the code-dependent load variation and deteriorates the SFDR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For high-speed DACs, the current source mismatches [1], [2], [8]- [10], code-dependent load variations [3]- [5], [11] and code-dependent switching glitches [2]- [4], [7] are the main issues that limit the SFDR. At higher frequencies, the finite output impedance due to parasitics worsens the code-dependent load variation and deteriorates the SFDR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Larger size of current source transistor results in large parasitic capacitance at the output node which combined with large output resistance and causes lower bandwidth with higher delay. To maintain a trade-off between output impedance, bandwidth and delay, optimized transistor size is chosen [7]. Current switches made up of NMOS transistor.…”
Section: Fig 2: Schematic Design Of Current Cellmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,15,16 The required signal attenuation to achieve the signal-independent ETR with different OSRs at different output frequencies is illustrated in Figure 8A where the number of current sources is 64. Besides the power consumption and timing requirement, this high operation speed also deteriorates the performance of each switching unit (the current source and the complementary switches), such as the finite output impedance, 3,24 and thus reduces the linearity. It means that, compared with a 3-GS/s Nyquist DAC with our proposed strategy, DACs with the ΔΣ-based techniques 12,15,16 require the circuits to operate at more than 15 GS/s to realize the signal-independent ETR.…”
Section: Comparisons With Similar Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Techniques used to improve the SFDR in high-speed applications rely on more stringent clocking 1,2,12-20 (eg, half-cycle sampling) or increased area [3][4][5][6][7][8]19,[21][22][23][24] (eg, 2 interleaved sub-DACs). One key performance metric for its high-speed and wideband applications is the dynamic linearity, usually evaluated as the spurious-free dynamic range (SFDR).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation