2015 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/iscas.2015.7168811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 14-bit 1.0-GS/s dynamic element matching DAC with >80 dB SFDR up to the Nyquist

Abstract: A 14-bit 1.0-GS/s current-steering digital-to-analog converter (DAC) was designed in a 65-nm CMOS process. For such current-steering DACs with a high sampling rate, the codedependent load variations and switching glitches are a main bottleneck which limits the spurious-free dynamic range (SFDR). Dynamic element matching (DEM) has been an effective solution to randomize these glitches for a higher SFDR and also to reduce the matching requirement of the current cells for an areaefficient design which also improv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(26 reference statements)
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulated DAC is constructed with transistors and has 14-bit resolution with 6 unary-weighted most significant bits (MSBs), 4 unary-weighted upper least significant bits, and 4 binary-weighted last-significant bits. It is because that the randomized operations in the time-relaxed interleaving digital-random-return-to-zero (TRI-DRRZ) 3 and the time-relaxed interleaving DEMRZ (TRI-DEMRZ) 4 usually increase the noise floor. Figure 17 shows the simulated SFDR and SNDR of a 14-bit 1-GS/s DAC with different techniques.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The simulated DAC is constructed with transistors and has 14-bit resolution with 6 unary-weighted most significant bits (MSBs), 4 unary-weighted upper least significant bits, and 4 binary-weighted last-significant bits. It is because that the randomized operations in the time-relaxed interleaving digital-random-return-to-zero (TRI-DRRZ) 3 and the time-relaxed interleaving DEMRZ (TRI-DEMRZ) 4 usually increase the noise floor. Figure 17 shows the simulated SFDR and SNDR of a 14-bit 1-GS/s DAC with different techniques.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 Fortunately, the redundancy can be reduced under 2 facts. The increased number of current sources will introduce more area and power consumption, which is the main drawback of all the techniques with redundancy, such as the interleaved RZ techniques.…”
Section: Redundancy-bandwidth Scalabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations