2015 IEEE International Interconnect Technology Conference and 2015 IEEE Materials for Advanced Metallization Conference (IITC/ 2015
DOI: 10.1109/iitc-mam.2015.7325605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cobalt bottom-up contact and via prefill enabling advanced logic and DRAM technologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The absorption spectra of the supernatants collected from the same dispersions, but now at pH 2, are shown in Figure 8. A spectral peak was observed at ∼517 nm which corresponds to the water soluble complex [Co(H 2 O) 6 ] 2+ as reported by several authors. [55][56][57] This indicates that not only temperature but also addition of H + ions enhances the dissolution rates of Co, consistent with Reaction 1 and Figure 1.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The absorption spectra of the supernatants collected from the same dispersions, but now at pH 2, are shown in Figure 8. A spectral peak was observed at ∼517 nm which corresponds to the water soluble complex [Co(H 2 O) 6 ] 2+ as reported by several authors. [55][56][57] This indicates that not only temperature but also addition of H + ions enhances the dissolution rates of Co, consistent with Reaction 1 and Figure 1.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 48%
“…Cobalt is a promising alternative to meet the challenges of interconnect lines at these lower nodes for the first two metal layers M1 and M2, due to its lower resistivity at smaller dimensions (∼10 nm) compared to copper. [4][5][6] Kamineni et al 7 proposed the use of chemical vapor deposited (CVD) cobalt to replace the widely used tungsten for local interconnects for 10 nm and smaller nodes. They emphasized two main advantages of CVD Co metallization which are a) CVD Co precursors do not damage the Ti liner enabling barrier scaling and b) it achieves void free fill in high aspect ratio features without defects, something that is difficult to achieve with a conventional physical vapor deposited (PVD) Co process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thinner barrier and adhesion layers, doping of metals to enhance the grain boundary conductance, and selective capping are some of the adopted solutions improving copper interconnects. Other short-term solutions to address the scaling challenges faced by Cu include load-aware redundant double vias to avoid EM issues [6], via prefill with alternate materials (like Cobalt) with higher current migration resistance and better fill [7], ultra-thin self-forming barriers (metal oxide barriers like MnO x ) to optimize the utilizable cross-section for Cu, alternative materials for better EM [8], reflow seed layers for defect reduction [9], etc. Nevertheless, these short-term steps aim to solve one or few of the Cu-foreseen issues at once and to combine them might prove to be impractical or just economically unfeasible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cobalt (Co) is considered as a promising alternative interconnect material to replace the conventionally used Cu. 6,7 At narrow dimensions, i.e., below 10 nm, Co exhibits comparable or lower electrical resistivity compared to Cu, largely attributed to the lower electron mean free path in Co (EMFP = 7-12 nm at room temperature). 7 Co thin-films can be fabricated using a variety of techniques, e.g., physical vapor deposition (PVD), 8,9 chemical vapor deposition (CVD), [10][11][12][13] vapor-phase atomic layer deposition (ALD), [14][15][16][17] and electroless deposition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Co thin-films can be fabricated using a variety of techniques, e.g., physical vapor deposition (PVD), 8,9 chemical vapor deposition (CVD), [10][11][12][13] vapor-phase atomic layer deposition (ALD), [14][15][16][17] and electroless deposition. 6,[18][19][20][21][22] PVD, CVD, and ALD processes have several drawbacks including the use of expensive targets or unstable metal-organic precursors. Electroless Co deposition too has drawbacks such as the use of toxic reductants, e.g., formaldehyde or hydrazine.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%