2017
DOI: 10.1109/mcas.2017.2689538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Survey of Carbon Nanotube Interconnects for Energy Efficient Integrated Circuits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…describes the dependence of the propagation time delay ratio of MWCNT interconnects with various s, where is their outermost shell diameter. The propagation time delay ratio is calculated by the ratio of propagation delay based on the pristine MWCNT [6,7]. In this study, we assumed that the MWCNT is filled with shells until its diameter is smaller than , and each shell of the doped MWCNT has the same .…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…describes the dependence of the propagation time delay ratio of MWCNT interconnects with various s, where is their outermost shell diameter. The propagation time delay ratio is calculated by the ratio of propagation delay based on the pristine MWCNT [6,7]. In this study, we assumed that the MWCNT is filled with shells until its diameter is smaller than , and each shell of the doped MWCNT has the same .…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we present a hierarchical simulation approach to studying of CNT-based interconnect performance [7][8][9]. The transport properties of CNT interconnects are first evaluated by ab-initio methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atomically thin, ballistic transport, large electron MFP and highly conductive carbon-based materials such as carbon nanotubes (CNTs) provide compelling advantages for the next generation of on-chip interconnects [3], [4]. CNTs are also listed as one of the future materials for advanced technology nodes based on IRDS 2017 report [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of strong sp 2 bonding between carbon atoms, CNT is much more resistant to electromigration (EM) and can sustain significantly larger current densities than Cu [5]. Furthermore, self-heating problem is a concern on deeply scaled Cu interconnects whereas CNTs have long ballistic electronic transport length ∼1µm, making them have higher electrical and thermal conductivities and thus capable of carrying high current density with virtually no heating thanks to its 1D electronic structure [6]- [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%