2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.06.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chitosan and guar gum composite films: Preparation, physical, mechanical and antimicrobial properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

22
113
2
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 248 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
22
113
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The results obtained in this work for the color and opacity of Ch-G membranes differ from those reported by Rao et al (2010), who obtained chitosan and guar gum membranes with lower opacity (15.91 ± 0.52%) and yellowish-green color with greater intensity (Hue = -57.76 and Chroma = 6.79). This difference may be attributed to the different method of preparation of the membranes used by Rao et al (2010), which did not include the neutralization step. In the present work, it was precisely at this step that the color of Ch-G membranes changed to a noticeably yellowish.…”
Section: Visual Aspect and Morphologycontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results obtained in this work for the color and opacity of Ch-G membranes differ from those reported by Rao et al (2010), who obtained chitosan and guar gum membranes with lower opacity (15.91 ± 0.52%) and yellowish-green color with greater intensity (Hue = -57.76 and Chroma = 6.79). This difference may be attributed to the different method of preparation of the membranes used by Rao et al (2010), which did not include the neutralization step. In the present work, it was precisely at this step that the color of Ch-G membranes changed to a noticeably yellowish.…”
Section: Visual Aspect and Morphologycontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…The existence of the neutralization step in the process of membrane production is important because it avoids potential dissolution of chitosan in aqueous solutions such as body fluids and, moreover, eliminates the irritating effect that the membrane could present when in contact with the lesion due to residual acetic acid. The difference of opacity may be related to the fact that the membranes obtained by Rao et al (2010) had a thickness about 2.5 times lower than those described in the present study (data not shown). Greater film thickness results in higher difficulty of light to pass through it, since the amount of material present therein is increased.…”
Section: Visual Aspect and Morphologycontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…The samples with air bubbles, nicks or tears and having mean thickness variation of greater that 5 % were excluded from analysis [37].…”
Section: Thickness Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sugere-se que a presença da galactose na estrutura da goma guar seja a responsável por tal fenômeno. Entretanto, outros autores já mencionaram que a goma guar aumenta a opacidade de filmes e geis sem mencionar tal afirmação (RAO et al, 2010;BEM;POLESI;SARMENTO, 2011). 5 7 9 12 T1 40,21…”
Section: Corunclassified